[PATCH v9 1/5] eal: add lcore info in telemetry

[David Marchand]

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:31 AM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:19 AM lihuisong (C) <lihuisong at huawei.com> wrote:
> > >>> +   if (info->lcore_id != lcore_id)
> > >> Suggest: info->lcore_id != lcore_id -> lcore_id != info->lcore_id
> > >> Here, info->lcore_id is a target and lcore_id is the variable to be
> > >> judged, right?
> > > Yeah that looks better. I didn't pay too much attention since this
> > > principle is not well respected in the current code base.
> > That's not a very good reason.
> > It's similar to "ret != 0" and "p != NULL" in DPDK coding style.
>
> I'll squash this suggestion when applying.

Hum, well, I have some other comments later in this series, so Robin
will fix this himself.


-- 
David Marchand