[PATCH v1 13/13] test/bbdev: remove iteration count check

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> To make the test compatible with devices that do not support early
> termination, the iteration count assert can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 6 +-----
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index 81bf2c8b60..c68d79cf29 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -2290,6 +2290,7 @@ static int
>   validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t n,
>   		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op, const int vector_mask)
>   {
> +	RTE_SET_USED(vector_mask);

Why not just remove vector_mask if it isn't of any use instead of hiding
the warning?

>   	unsigned int i;
>   	int ret;
>   	struct op_data_entries *hard_data_orig =
> @@ -2299,17 +2300,12 @@ validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t n,
>   	struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ops_td;
>   	struct rte_bbdev_op_data *hard_output;
>   	struct rte_bbdev_op_data *soft_output;
> -	struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ref_td = &ref_op->turbo_dec;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
>   		ops_td = &ops[i]->turbo_dec;
>   		hard_output = &ops_td->hard_output;
>   		soft_output = &ops_td->soft_output;
>   
> -		if (vector_mask & TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_ITER_COUNT)
> -			TEST_ASSERT(ops_td->iter_count <= ref_td->iter_count,
> -					"Returned iter_count (%d) > expected iter_count (%d)",
> -					ops_td->iter_count, ref_td->iter_count);
>   		ret = check_dec_status_and_ordering(ops[i], i, ref_op->status);
>   		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
>   				"Checking status and ordering for decoder failed");

Maxime