[PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 10:31:42 +0000
Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu at intel.com> wrote:

> iff --git a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> index db58157ba3..59883af8a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> @@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ idpf_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct idpf_adapter_ext *adapter_ex)
>  	struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
>  	enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
>  	struct idpf_vport *vport;
> -	enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
>  	uint16_t pending = 1;
> +	enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	while (pending) {


Why does order of declarations matter here?
Compilers are free to reorder this.