[PATCH v4] lib/bpf: Rename bpf function names to avoid potential conflict with libpcap

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:55:34 +0800
"J.J. Martzki" <mars14850 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've read the libbpf code again and I found some other functions with
> pure 'bpf_' prefix. Should we rename all the functions whose names
> start with pure 'bpf_'?

Yes, all visible (ie non-static) functions should use a DPDK style
prefix.