[PATCH 1/2] net/virtio: propagate return value of called function

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 3/28/23 06:14, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Boleslav Stankevich <boleslav.stankevich at oktetlabs.ru>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2023 6:23 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Boleslav Stankevich <boleslav.stankevich at oktetlabs.ru>;
>> stable at dpdk.org; Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>; Maxime
>> Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>;
>> David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>; Hyong Youb Kim
>> <hyonkim at cisco.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra at marvell.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net/virtio: propagate return value of called function
>>
>> rte_intr_vec_list_alloc() may fail because of different reasons which
>> are indicated by different negative errno values.
>>
>> Fixes: d61138d4f0e2 ("drivers: remove direct access to interrupt handle")
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boleslav Stankevich <boleslav.stankevich at oktetlabs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> 
> I see Boleslav's email is updated in mailmap file but patchwork is still complaining
> about it.
> 
> @Adrew & Maxime,
> 
> Do you know why?

My idea was that next-virtio was not updated yet at that
moment. Don't know how to check it. May be just resent?

Andrew.