[PATCH v3 09/12] baseband/acc: add FFT support to VRB2 variant

Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Thu Oct 5 16:34:55 CEST 2023



On 10/4/23 23:18, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 12:11 AM
>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; david.marchand at redhat.com; Vargas, Hernan
>> <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] baseband/acc: add FFT support to VRB2 variant
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/3/23 20:20, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
>>> Hi Maxime,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 7:37 AM
>>>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; david.marchand at redhat.com; Vargas,
>> Hernan
>>>> <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] baseband/acc: add FFT support to VRB2
>>>> variant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/23 18:35, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
>>>>> Support for the FFT the processing specific to the
>>>>> VRB2 variant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 132
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>     1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> index 93add82947..ce4b90d8e7 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ vrb_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t
>>>> queue_id,
>>>>>     			ACC_FCW_LD_BLEN : (conf->op_type ==
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT ?
>>>>>     			ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN : ACC_FCW_MLDTS_BLEN))));
>>>>>
>>>>> +	if ((q->d->device_variant == VRB2_VARIANT) && (conf->op_type ==
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT))
>>>>> +		fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3;
>>>>> +
>>>>>     	for (desc_idx = 0; desc_idx < d->sw_ring_max_depth; desc_idx++) {
>>>>>     		desc = q->ring_addr + desc_idx;
>>>>>     		desc->req.word0 = ACC_DMA_DESC_TYPE; @@ -1323,6
>>>> +1326,24 @@
>>>>> vrb_dev_info_get(struct rte_bbdev *dev, struct rte_bbdev_driver_info
>>>> *dev_info)
>>>>>     			.num_buffers_soft_out = 0,
>>>>>     			}
>>>>>     		},
>>>>> +		{
>>>>> +			.type	= RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT,
>>>>> +			.cap.fft = {
>>>>> +				.capability_flags =
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_CS_ADJUSTMENT |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DFT_BYPASS |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_IDFT_BYPASS |
>>>>> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT
>>>> |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS |
>>>>> +
>>>> 	RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS,
>>>>> +				.num_buffers_src =
>>>>> +						1,
>>>>> +				.num_buffers_dst =
>>>>> +						1,
>>>>> +			}
>>>>> +		},
>>>>>     		RTE_BBDEV_END_OF_CAPABILITIES_LIST()
>>>>>     	};
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -3849,6 +3870,47 @@ vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op
>>>>> *op,
>>>> struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw)
>>>>>     		fcw->bypass = 0;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Fill in a frame control word for FFT processing. */ static
>>>>> +inline void vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct
>>>>> +acc_fcw_fft_3 *fcw) {
>>>>> +	fcw->in_frame_size = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
>>>>> +	fcw->leading_pad_size = op->fft.input_leading_padding;
>>>>> +	fcw->out_frame_size = op->fft.output_sequence_size;
>>>>> +	fcw->leading_depad_size = op->fft.output_leading_depadding;
>>>>> +	fcw->cs_window_sel = op->fft.window_index[0] +
>>>>> +			(op->fft.window_index[1] << 8) +
>>>>> +			(op->fft.window_index[2] << 16) +
>>>>> +			(op->fft.window_index[3] << 24);
>>>>> +	fcw->cs_window_sel2 = op->fft.window_index[4] +
>>>>> +			(op->fft.window_index[5] << 8);
>>>>> +	fcw->cs_enable_bmap = op->fft.cs_bitmap;
>>>>> +	fcw->num_antennas = op->fft.num_antennas_log2;
>>>>> +	fcw->idft_size = op->fft.idft_log2;
>>>>> +	fcw->dft_size = op->fft.dft_log2;
>>>>> +	fcw->cs_offset = op->fft.cs_time_adjustment;
>>>>> +	fcw->idft_shift = op->fft.idft_shift;
>>>>> +	fcw->dft_shift = op->fft.dft_shift;
>>>>> +	fcw->cs_multiplier = op->fft.ncs_reciprocal;
>>>>> +	fcw->power_shift = op->fft.power_shift; > +	fcw->exp_adj = op-
>>>>> fft.fp16_exp_adjust;
>>>>> +	fcw->fp16_in = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT);
>>>>> +	fcw->fp16_out = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT);
>>>>> +	fcw->power_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS);
>>>>> +	if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>>> +			RTE_BBDEV_FFT_IDFT_BYPASS)) {
>>>>> +		if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>>> +				RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS))
>>>>> +			fcw->bypass = 2;
>>>>> +		else
>>>>> +			fcw->bypass = 1;
>>>>> +	} else if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>>> +			RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DFT_BYPASS))
>>>>> +		fcw->bypass = 3;
>>>>> +	else
>>>>> +		fcw->bypass = 0;
>>>>
>>>> The only difference I see with VRB1 are backed by corresponding
>>>> op_flags (POWER & FP16), is that correct? If so, it does not make
>>>> sense to me to have a specific function for VRB2.
>>>
>>> There are more changes but these are only formally enabled in the next
>>> stepping hence some of the related code is not included yet. More generally
>> the FCW and IP is different from VRB1 implementation.
>>
>> Currently, the code is almost identical so vrb1 implementation should be
>> reused. If some later changes makes the two implementations diverge, then we
>> can consider having a dedicated function for VRB2 at that time.
> 
> If I may, I believe this is best as-is notably for patches and support.
> The functions are fairly small (not much code overlap quantitatively) and the underlying IP is different
> (with more differences we can enable over time). I don’t think it would help anyone really to try to make them
> coexist for a small period of time.
> Does that sound fair?

I disagree, as I explained the code currently is almost identical, so
just share the code.

You will diverge, if *really* necessary, when it will make more sense to
have two separate functions. For now it is not the case in my opinion.

Thanks,
Maxime

> 
> 
>>
>>>>
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>     static inline int
>>>>>     vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>>>>>     		struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc,
>>>>> @@ -3882,6 +3944,58 @@ vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct
>>>>> rte_bbdev_fft_op
>>>> *op,
>>>>>     	return 0;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static inline int
>>>>> +vrb2_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>>>>> +		struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc,
>>>>> +		struct rte_mbuf *input, struct rte_mbuf *output, struct
>>>> rte_mbuf *win_input,
>>>>> +		struct rte_mbuf *pwr, uint32_t *in_offset, uint32_t
>>>> *out_offset,
>>>>> +		uint32_t *win_offset, uint32_t *pwr_offset) {
>>>>> +	bool pwr_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS);
>>>>> +	bool win_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING);
>>>>> +	int num_cs = 0, i, bd_idx = 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* FCW already done */
>>>>> +	acc_header_init(desc);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	RTE_SET_USED(win_input);
>>>>> +	RTE_SET_USED(win_offset);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(input,
>>>> *in_offset);
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.input_sequence_size *
>>>> ACC_IQ_SIZE;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_IN;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 1;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
>>>>> +	bd_idx++;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(output,
>>>> *out_offset);
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.output_sequence_size *
>>>> ACC_IQ_SIZE;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_OUT_HARD;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = pwr_en ? 0 : 1;
>>>>> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
>>>>> +	desc->m2dlen = win_en ? 3 : 2;
>>>>> +	desc->d2mlen = pwr_en ? 2 : 1;
>>>>> +	desc->ib_ant_offset = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
>>>>> +	desc->num_ant = op->fft.num_antennas_log2 - 3;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_BBDEV_MAX_CS; i++)
>>>>> +		if (check_bit(op->fft.cs_bitmap, 1 << i))
>>>>> +			num_cs++;
>>>>> +	desc->num_cs = num_cs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (pwr_en && pwr) {
>>>>> +		bd_idx++;
>>>>> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address =
>>>> rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(pwr, *pwr_offset);
>>>>> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = num_cs * (1 << op-
>>>>> fft.num_antennas_log2) * 4;
>>>>> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_OUT_SOFT;
>>>>> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 1;
>>>>> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +	desc->ob_cyc_offset = op->fft.output_sequence_size;
>>>>> +	desc->ob_ant_offset = op->fft.output_sequence_size * num_cs;
>>>>> +	desc->op_addr = op;
>>>>> +	return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>>
>>>>>     /** Enqueue one FFT operation for device. */
>>>>>     static inline int
>>>>> @@ -3889,22 +4003,32 @@ vrb_enqueue_fft_one_op(struct acc_queue
>> *q,
>>>> struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>>>>>     		uint16_t total_enqueued_cbs)
>>>>>     {
>>>>>     	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
>>>>> -	struct rte_mbuf *input, *output;
>>>>> -	uint32_t in_offset, out_offset;
>>>>> +	struct rte_mbuf *input, *output, *pwr, *win;
>>>>> +	uint32_t in_offset, out_offset, pwr_offset, win_offset;
>>>>>     	struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw;
>>>>>
>>>>>     	desc = acc_desc(q, total_enqueued_cbs);
>>>>>     	input = op->fft.base_input.data;
>>>>>     	output = op->fft.base_output.data;
>>>>> +	pwr = op->fft.power_meas_output.data;
>>>>> +	win = op->fft.dewindowing_input.data;
>>>>>     	in_offset = op->fft.base_input.offset;
>>>>>     	out_offset = op->fft.base_output.offset;
>>>>> +	pwr_offset = op->fft.power_meas_output.offset;
>>>>> +	win_offset = op->fft.dewindowing_input.offset;
>>>>>
>>>>>     	fcw = (struct acc_fcw_fft *) (q->fcw_ring +
>>>>>     			((q->sw_ring_head + total_enqueued_cbs) & q-
>>>>> sw_ring_wrap_mask)
>>>>>     			* ACC_MAX_FCW_SIZE);
>>>>>
>>>>> -	vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(op, fcw);
>>>>> -	vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output, &in_offset,
>>>> &out_offset);
>>>>> +	if (q->d->device_variant == VRB1_VARIANT) {
>>>>> +		vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(op, fcw);
>>>>> +		vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output,
>>>> &in_offset, &out_offset);
>>>>> +	} else {
>>>>> +		vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(op, (struct acc_fcw_fft_3 *) fcw);
>>>>> +		vrb2_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output, win,
>>>> pwr,
>>>>> +				&in_offset, &out_offset, &win_offset,
>>>> &pwr_offset);
>>>>> +	}
>>>>>     #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
>>>>>     	rte_memdump(stderr, "FCW", &desc->req.fcw_fft,
>>>>>     			sizeof(desc->req.fcw_fft));
>>>
> 



More information about the dev mailing list