[PATCH v2] config/arm: update aarch32 build with gcc13
Paul Szczepanek
paul.szczepanek at arm.com
Thu Oct 12 14:40:11 CEST 2023
On 09/10/2023 10:53, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> The aarch32 with gcc13 fails with:
>
> Compiler for C supports arguments -march=armv8-a: NO
>
> ../config/arm/meson.build:714:12: ERROR: Problem encountered: No
> suitable armv8 march version found.
>
> This is because we test -march=armv8-a alone (without the -mpfu option),
> which is no longer supported in gcc13 aarch32 builds.
>
> The most recent recommendation from the compiler team is to build with
> -march=armv8-a+simd -mfpu=auto, which should work for compilers old and
> new. The suggestion is to first check -march=armv8-a+simd and only then
> check -mfpu=auto.
>
> To address this, add a way to force the architecture (the value of
> the -march option).
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
> Acked-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
> ---
> config/arm/meson.build | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build
> index 3f22d8a2fc..5303d0e969 100644
> --- a/config/arm/meson.build
> +++ b/config/arm/meson.build
> @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ implementer_generic = {
> },
> 'generic_aarch32': {
> 'march': 'armv8-a',
> - 'compiler_options': ['-mfpu=neon'],
> + 'force_march': true,
> + 'march_features': ['simd'],
> + 'compiler_options': ['-mfpu=auto'],
> 'flags': [
> ['RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON_MEMCPY', false],
> ['RTE_ARCH_STRICT_ALIGN', true],
> @@ -711,7 +713,11 @@ if update_flags
> endif
> endforeach
> if candidate_march == ''
> - error('No suitable armv8 march version found.')
> + if part_number_config.get('force_march', false)
> + candidate_march = part_number_config['march']
> + else
> + error('No suitable armv8 march version found.')
> + endif
This section is only used when no candidate is found, this would make it
not really be a forced arch but more a fallback arch. If we want the
user to be able to really force the march string we'd need to put the
"is forced?" check higher. Am I reading the code right?
> endif
> if candidate_march != part_number_config['march']
> warning('Configuration march version is ' +
> @@ -741,7 +747,7 @@ if update_flags
> # apply supported compiler options
> if part_number_config.has_key('compiler_options')
> foreach flag: part_number_config['compiler_options']
> - if cc.has_argument(flag)
> + if cc.has_multi_arguments(machine_args + [flag])
> machine_args += flag
> else
> warning('Configuration compiler option ' +
More information about the dev
mailing list