[PATCH v1 1/1] usertools/devbind: update coding style
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Tue Dec 3 09:55:30 CET 2024
On 12/2/2024 6:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:09:34 +0000
> Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> + # For kernels < 3.15 when binding devices to a generic driver (i.e. one that doesn't have a PCI
>> + # ID table) using new_id, some devices that are not bound to any other driver could be bound
>> + # even if no one has asked them to. hence, we check the list of drivers again, and see if some
>> + # of the previously-unbound devices were erroneously bound.
>> + if not devbind.use_driver_override:
>
> Why is tool still supporting out of date and no longer supported kernel?
The aim was 100% compatibility with the old script, but I agree these
parts can be taken out as this kernel is no longer supported. This will
definitely make the binding code simpler.
>
>
>
>> + choices=[
>> + "baseband",
>> + "compress",
>> + "crypto",
>> + "dma",
>> + "event",
>> + "mempool",
>> + "misc",
>> + "net",
>> + "regex",
>> + "ml",
>> + "all",
>> + ],
>
> Would prefer that all the types are in table/list and the help just
> references that list. The next time a type is added, only one place
> needs to change.
It's a bit difficult to have *everything* as one list, as there are
multiple places where we use this:
1) initial declarations at the top of the file (which I treat as "ground
truth" for what sort of devices devbind aims to recognize)
2) categorization rules (which are inside Devbind class)
3) command line arguments
4) printouts
I suppose I can merge 3 and 4, but I don't see a neat way to specify 1)
and 2) in a way that we can reuse elsewhere. I'll think on this though,
thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Also, I would not trust the output format of ip route not to change.
> If the utility has to parse output of ip command, use json (-j) instead.
>
> This whole section of code is quite fragile:
>
>> if devices_type == network_devices:
>> # check what is the interface if any for an ssh connection if
>> # any to this host, so we can mark it later.
>> ssh_if = []
>> route = subprocess.check_output(["ip", "-o", "route"])
>> # filter out all lines for 169.254 routes
>> route = "\n".join(filter(lambda ln: not ln.startswith("169.254"),
>> route.decode().splitlines()))
>> rt_info = route.split()
>> for i in range(len(rt_info) - 1):
>> if rt_info[i] == "dev":
>> ssh_if.append(rt_info[i + 1])
The quoted code is from old devbind code, but I agree that relying on -o
output is not ideal, and using -j will be better. I'll fix it in v2.
Thanks for your feedback!
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list