[PATCH v5 13/34] net/ixgbe: decouple scalar and vec rxq free mbufs
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Mon Jun 9 12:43:45 CEST 2025
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 06:08:52PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> Currently, vector Rx queue release mbufs function is only called from
> inside the scalar variant. Decouple them to allow both to be defined
> separately from each other, and provide a common function that picks
> between the two when necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v5:
> - Add this commit
>
One thought on the naming - not so sure about the "_common" suffix on the
function. Might it be better to keep the "ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs"
name for the common function, and rename the scalar function to have a
"non_vec" suffix?
Either with above suggestion, or as you have it below:
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index fad4a01a10..ecd1f38ac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -2970,12 +2970,6 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> {
> unsigned i;
>
> - /* SSE Vector driver has a different way of releasing mbufs. */
> - if (rxq->vector_rx) {
> - ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec(rxq);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> if (rxq->sw_ring != NULL) {
> for (i = 0; i < rxq->nb_rx_desc; i++) {
> if (rxq->sw_ring[i].mbuf != NULL) {
> @@ -3002,11 +2996,20 @@ ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> }
> }
>
> +static void __rte_cold
> +ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_common(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> +{
> + if (rxq->vector_rx)
> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec(rxq);
> + else
> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
> +}
> +
> static void __rte_cold
> ixgbe_rx_queue_release(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> {
> if (rxq != NULL) {
> - ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_common(rxq);
> rte_free(rxq->sw_ring);
> rte_free(rxq->sw_sc_ring);
> rte_memzone_free(rxq->mz);
> @@ -3501,7 +3504,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_clear_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
>
> if (rxq != NULL) {
> - ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_common(rxq);
> ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(adapter, rxq);
> dev->data->rx_queue_state[i] = RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STOPPED;
> }
> @@ -5701,7 +5704,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id)
>
> rte_delay_us(RTE_IXGBE_WAIT_100_US);
>
> - ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(rxq);
> + ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_common(rxq);
> ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(adapter, rxq);
> dev->data->rx_queue_state[rx_queue_id] = RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STOPPED;
>
> --
> 2.47.1
>
More information about the dev
mailing list