[PATCH v2] test/argparse: change initialization to workaround LTO

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:20:21 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:

> We should consider either making this a "do { } while" loop or adding the
> termination condition to the "for" loop statement as normal. For example:
> 
> 	unsigned int i = 0;
> 
> 	obj = backup;
> 	do {
> 		obj.args[i] = backup.args[i];
> 	} while (backup.args[++i].name_long != NULL);
> 
> or else:
> 
> 	obj = backup;
> 	for (i = 0; backup.args[i].name_long != NULL; i++)
> 		obj.args[i] = backup.args[i];
> 	obj.args[i] = ARGPARSE_ARG_END();
> 
> I'd tend toward the second, myself, but what is in your patch above is fine
> as-is too.

Agree with one of the two is more readable.
I kind of wanted to keep what original code was doing.