[PATCH v5 2/3] cmdline: add floating point support
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Fri May 23 12:21:15 CEST 2025
On 5/21/2025 4:05 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2025 16:22:11 +0100
> Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> +NUMERIC_TYPES = {
>> + "UINT8": "uint8_t",
>> + "UINT16": "uint16_t",
>> + "UINT32": "uint32_t",
>> + "UINT64": "uint64_t",
>> + "INT8": "int8_t",
>> + "INT16": "int16_t",
>> + "INT32": "int32_t",
>> + "INT64": "int64_t",
>> + "FLOAT_SINGLE": "float",
>> + "FLOAT_DOUBLE": "double",
>> +}
>>
>
> Is it really worth having both single and double versions.
> Seems like unnecessary complexity at this point.
I'd argue the same about the various int types. I was just being
consistent. I can remove the single (or double) if that's desired.
>
>> @@ -291,6 +302,25 @@ cmdline_parse_num(cmdline_parse_token_hdr_t *tk, const char *srcbuf, void *res,
>> return -1;
>> }
>> return ret;
>> + /* float parsing */
>> + } else if (nd.type >= RTE_FLOAT_SINGLE && nd.type <= RTE_FLOAT_DOUBLE) {
>> + char *end;
>> + double dres = strtod(srcbuf, &end);
>> +
>> + if (end == srcbuf || !cmdline_isendoftoken(*end) || isinf(dres))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + /* we parsed something, now let's ensure it fits */
>> + if (nd.type == RTE_FLOAT_SINGLE) {
>> + float flt = (float)dres;
>> + if (isinf(flt))
>> + return -1;
>> + if (res) *(float *)res = flt;
>> + return end-srcbuf;
>> + } else if (nd.type == RTE_FLOAT_DOUBLE) {
>> + if (res) *(double *)res = dres;
>> + return end-srcbuf;
>
> Space around - please
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list