[PATCH v4 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Sat Nov 8 02:09:09 CET 2025
On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 17:45:51 +0000
Marat Khalili <marat.khalili at huawei.com> wrote:
> P.S. When running with UB sanitizer:
>
> RTE>>bpf_elf_load_autotest
> BPF: resolve_xsym(40): EBPF_PSEUDO_CALL to external function: dummy_func1
> ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c:247:24: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 2147483647 cannot be represented in type 'long int'
> #0 0x2b1fdca in eval_add ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c:247
> #1 0x2b2b9dc in eval_alu ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c:691
> #2 0x2b3b187 in evaluate ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c:2446
> #3 0x2b3bf0f in __rte_bpf_validate ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c:2537
> #4 0x2b19b33 in rte_bpf_load ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_load.c:113
> #5 0x2b47d6d in bpf_load_elf ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c:288
> #6 0x2b47fe8 in rte_bpf_elf_load ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c:320
> #7 0x66b4b8 in test_bpf_elf_load ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3382
Hmm. looks like a pre-existing BPF library bug since this code was never
tested before.
More information about the dev
mailing list