[PATCH v7 06/13] eal: define the EAL parameters in argparse format

[Bruce Richardson]

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 10:46:22AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 17:13, Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> > > It seems this comment got lost.
> > >
> > > Options don't change that often, but I would prefer we point at the
> > > right release doc, rather than origin/main.
> > > What do you think of:
> > >
> > > @@ -164,11 +164,17 @@ eal_usage(const struct rte_argparse *obj)
> > >  },
> > >  #define STR_ALIAS STR_ARG
> > >
> > > +#if RTE_VER_RELEASE == 99
> > > +#define DOC_SUFFIX "-" RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MAJOR)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define DOC_SUFFIX
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  struct rte_argparse eal_argparse  = {
> > >         .prog_name = "",
> > >         .usage = "<DPDK EAL options> -- <App options>",
> > >         .epilog = "For more information on EAL options, see the DPDK
> > > documentation at: \n"
> > > -                       "\thttps://doc.dpdk.org/guides/"
> > > RTE_EXEC_ENV_NAME "_gsg/",
> > > +                       "\thttps://doc.dpdk.org/guides" DOC_SUFFIX "/"
> > > RTE_EXEC_ENV_NAME "_gsg/",
> > >
> > Yes, that can work, though RTE_VER_MAJOR doesn't exist that I can see. Will
> > rework it a bit.
> 
> Ah sorry, it was in my previous comment:
> https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8y5_O3T6hLbZov0LqhXyAu2s_n0P3C3Y+WSGVUjd8gbtg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
Ah, ok, sorry I missed the comment the first time. I've implemented this
without RTE_MAJOR for now anyway.

/Bruce