[PATCH v4 3/4] net/macb: add NEON vectorized Rx/Tx
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Sun Oct 26 19:17:31 CET 2025
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 06:59:12 +0000
liwencheng <liwencheng at phytium.com.cn> wrote:
> +static inline uint8x8_t macb_mbuf_initializer(struct macb_rx_queue *rxq)
> +{
> + volatile struct rte_mbuf mbuf = {.buf_addr = 0}; /* zeroed mbuf */
There is no way an on stack variable could be volatile. What it looks like
your are doing is trying to workaround misunderstanding of atomic.
> + uint64x1_t mbuf_initializer;
> + uint8x8_t rearm_data_vec;
> +
> + mbuf.data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + MACB_RX_DATA_OFFSET;
> + mbuf.nb_segs = 1;
> + mbuf.port = rxq->port_id;
Why not just put these into the initializer?
> + rte_mbuf_refcnt_set((struct rte_mbuf *)&mbuf, 1);
> +
> + /* prevent compiler reordering: rearm_data covers previous fields */
> + rte_compiler_barrier();
You would be better off doing an atomic store with the right type of memory
order, rather than weak + barrier. But would have to handle case where
refcounts are compiled out.
> + mbuf_initializer =
> + vset_lane_u64(*(uint64_t *)(&mbuf.rearm_data), mbuf_initializer, 0);
Take the volatile of mbuf and you won't have compiler warning.
> + rearm_data_vec = vld1_u8((uint8_t *)&mbuf_initializer);
> + return rearm_data_vec;
> +}
More information about the dev
mailing list