[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 0/2] graph: dispatch mode improvements
Jerin Jacob
jerinj at marvell.com
Wed Sep 24 16:30:04 CEST 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 7:49 PM
> To: Christophe Fontaine <cfontain at redhat.com>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> <kirankumark at marvell.com>; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram
> <ndabilpuram at marvell.com>; Zhirun Yan <yanzhirun_163 at 163.com>;
> dev at dpdk.org; Guvenc Gulce <guvenc.gulce at gmail.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 0/2] graph: dispatch mode improvements
>
> 23/07/2025 18: 49, Christophe Fontaine: > Small series to improve dispatch
> mode for lib/graph. > In order to run an instance of the graph in a control
> thread (slow path > defined as nodes) in addition to the datapath thread, we
> need: ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart Prioritize security for external emails:
> Confirm sender and content safety before clicking links or opening attachments
> <https://us-phishalarm-
> ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/CRVmXkqW!s03Z1P80YjX6F8USVpU1pEPnEL9aBV
> CDmZhTUwMWrUFrDQFePMFjzqQsmmFOvE8V7-Hk$>
> Report Suspicious
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> 23/07/2025 18:49, Christophe Fontaine:
> > Small series to improve dispatch mode for lib/graph.
> > In order to run an instance of the graph in a control thread (slow
> > path defined as nodes) in addition to the datapath thread, we need:
> > - the ability to run graph_walk on an non-eal thread
> > - a signaling mechanism to wake up the control thread
>
> Should I expect a review before merging? Someone?
@Zhirun Yan The changes are for mcore dispatch, please review.
In general, changes looks good to me.
>
More information about the dev
mailing list