[EXTERNAL] [dpdk-dev v1] cryptodev: introduce constant-time memory comparison

[Konstantin Ananyev]

> 
> 
> > 25/09/2025 12:33, Akhil Goyal:
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Constant-time memory comparison for cryptographic use.
> > > > + * Returns 0 if the memory regions are equal, nonzero otherwise.
> > > > + * Runs in constant time with respect to the length to prevent timing
> attacks.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @param a
> > > > + *   Pointer to the first memory region.
> > > > + * @param b
> > > > + *   Pointer to the second memory region.
> > > > + * @param n
> > > > + *   Number of bytes to compare.
> > > > + * @return
> > > > + *   0 if memory regions are equal, nonzero otherwise.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define rte_consttime_memcmp(a, b, n) __extension__ ({ \
> > > > +	const volatile uint8_t *__pa = (const volatile uint8_t *)(a); \
> > > > +	const volatile uint8_t *__pb = (const volatile uint8_t *)(b); \
> > > > +	uint8_t __result = 0; \
> > > > +	for (size_t __i = 0; __i < (n); __i++) \
> > > > +		__result |= __pa[__i] ^ __pb[__i]; \
> > > > +	__result; \
> > > > +})
> > >
> > > I believe this is not the right place to add this define.
> > > It should be somewhere in common eal if it is already not there.
> >
> > Yes indeed.
> > cryptodev is the API for managing crypto devices.
> > A new memcmp function would be better hosted in libc,
> > and in EAL for compatibility with all supported libc.
> >
> > I mean please add it in EAL, and propose it to glibc as well.
> 
> Stupid q: what's wrong with standard C memcmp() function?

Ah, sorry, didn't read properly.
Please disregard, and yes - might be EAL is the right place for it.