[PATCH] bpf/arm64: support packet data load instructions

[Morten Brørup]

> BTW, I think we still need to add check for overflow in
> __rte_pktmbuf_read() -
> bpf jit is not the only user of it.
> Unless, of-course, we want rte_pktmbuf_read() to work with wrapped-
> around values.

It makes no sense for rte_pktmbuf_read() to wrap around.
Its offset and length parameters are clearly specified and documented as unsigned, and there is no mention of wrap-around or implicit negative values when summing them.
I have submitted a fix just now:
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20260319084048.652493-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com/T/#u

-Morten