[PATCH v2 8/9] bpf: make callback handle atomic with relaxed access

Konstantin Ananyev konstantin.v.ananyev at yandex.ru
Mon Oct 19 23:27:11 CEST 2026




> The callback handle member cb of struct bpf_eth_cbi is concurrently
> cleared by the control plane on unload and read by the datapath to
> decide whether to execute the BPF filter program. Without atomic typing,
> this concurrent access constitutes a data race in the C11 memory model,
Hmm... why is that?
So far, I don't see any.
Can you probably point where you believe is a data-race, and how using 
atomic
load/store can prevent it.

> even though hardware pointer accesses are single-copy atomic and untorn.
>
> Change cb to RTE_ATOMIC and use rte_atomic_load_explicit() and
> rte_atomic_store_explicit() with rte_memory_order_relaxed for all its
> accesses. On modern architectures this produces the exact same machine
> code while eliminating undefined behavior.
>
> In addition, marking cb as atomic improves code self-documentation by
> making it immediately evident that cb is an active part of the cross-
> thread synchronization mechanism on par with use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <qm2k21 at gmail.com>
> ---
>   lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> index c5fa85bf84..0b59ce22f1 100644
> --- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> +++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
>   struct __rte_cache_aligned bpf_eth_cbi {
>   	/* used by both data & control path */
>   	RTE_ATOMIC(bool) use;    /* usage flag: true when in use, false otherwise */
> -	const struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback *cb;  /* callback handle */
> +	RTE_ATOMIC(const struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback *) cb;  /* callback handle */
>   	struct rte_bpf *bpf;
>   	struct rte_bpf_jit jit;
>   	/* used by control path only */
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ bpf_rx_callback_vm(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_vm(cbi->bpf, pkt, nb_pkts, 1) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ bpf_rx_callback_jit(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_jit(&cbi->jit, pkt, nb_pkts, 1) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ bpf_tx_callback_vm(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_vm(cbi->bpf, pkt, nb_pkts, 0) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bpf_tx_callback_jit(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_jit(&cbi->jit, pkt, nb_pkts, 0) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ bpf_rx_callback_mb_vm(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_mb_vm(cbi->bpf, pkt, nb_pkts, 1) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ bpf_rx_callback_mb_jit(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_mb_jit(&cbi->jit, pkt, nb_pkts, 1) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ bpf_tx_callback_mb_vm(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_mb_vm(cbi->bpf, pkt, nb_pkts, 0) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ bpf_tx_callback_mb_jit(__rte_unused uint16_t port, __rte_unused uint16_t queue,
>   
>   	cbi = user_param;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_inuse(cbi);
> -	rc = (cbi->cb != NULL) ?
> +	rc = (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&cbi->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL) ?
>   		pkt_filter_mb_jit(&cbi->jit, pkt, nb_pkts, 0) :
>   		nb_pkts;
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unuse(cbi);
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static void
>   bpf_eth_cbi_unload(struct bpf_eth_cbi *bc)
>   {
>   	/* mark this cbi as empty */
> -	bc->cb = NULL;
> +	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&bc->cb, NULL, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
>   
>   	/* make sure datapath doesn't use bpf anymore, then destroy bpf */
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_wait(bc);
> @@ -495,16 +495,21 @@ bpf_eth_cbi_unload(struct bpf_eth_cbi *bc)
>   static void
>   bpf_eth_unload(struct bpf_eth_cbh *cbh, uint16_t port, uint16_t queue)
>   {
> +	const struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback *cb;
>   	struct bpf_eth_cbi *bc;
>   
>   	bc = bpf_eth_cbh_find(cbh, port, queue);
> -	if (bc == NULL || bc->cb == NULL)
> +	if (bc == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	cb = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&bc->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
> +	if (cb == NULL)
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (cbh->type == BPF_ETH_RX)
> -		rte_eth_remove_rx_callback(port, queue, bc->cb);
> +		rte_eth_remove_rx_callback(port, queue, cb);
>   	else
> -		rte_eth_remove_tx_callback(port, queue, bc->cb);
> +		rte_eth_remove_tx_callback(port, queue, cb);
>   
>   	bpf_eth_cbi_unload(bc);
>   }
> @@ -581,6 +586,7 @@ bpf_eth_elf_install(struct bpf_eth_cbh *cbh, uint16_t port, uint16_t queue,
>   	struct rte_bpf *bpf, uint32_t flags)
>   {
>   	int32_t rc;
> +	const struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback *cb;
>   	struct bpf_eth_cbi *bc;
>   	rte_rx_callback_fn frx;
>   	rte_tx_callback_fn ftx;
> @@ -625,18 +631,20 @@ bpf_eth_elf_install(struct bpf_eth_cbh *cbh, uint16_t port, uint16_t queue,
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
>   	/* remove old one, if any */
> -	if (bc->cb != NULL)
> +	if (rte_atomic_load_explicit(&bc->cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed) != NULL)
>   		bpf_eth_unload(cbh, port, queue);
>   
>   	bc->bpf = bpf;
>   	bc->jit = jit;
>   
>   	if (cbh->type == BPF_ETH_RX)
> -		bc->cb = rte_eth_add_rx_callback(port, queue, frx, bc);
> +		cb = rte_eth_add_rx_callback(port, queue, frx, bc);
>   	else
> -		bc->cb = rte_eth_add_tx_callback(port, queue, ftx, bc);
> +		cb = rte_eth_add_tx_callback(port, queue, ftx, bc);
> +
> +	rte_atomic_store_explicit(&bc->cb, cb, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
>   
> -	if (bc->cb == NULL) {
> +	if (cb == NULL) {
>   		rc = -rte_errno;
>   		bpf_eth_cbi_cleanup(bc);
>   	} else



More information about the dev mailing list