[PATCH v2] crypto/ipsec_mb: require minimum version 2.0 for IPsec MB

[Radu Nicolau]

On 15-Oct-26 4:46 PM, Wathsala Vithanage wrote:
>
> On 10/14/26 09:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 14/10/2026 14:44, Radu Nicolau:
>>> On 14-Oct-26 1:16 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 14/10/2026 11:37, Radu Nicolau:
>>>>> On 13-Oct-26 8:51 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>>>> 24/09/2026 13:18, Akhil Goyal:
>>>>>>>> From: Nicolau, Radu <radu.nicolau at intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> Increase the minimum required IPsec MB library version to 2.0 
>>>>>>>>> As a
>>>>>>>>> consequence, clean up the aesni_mb PMD code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
>>>>>>> Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
>>>>>> As usual with Intel IPsec MB, it triggers a compilation failure 
>>>>>> on Arm:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_aesni_mb.c:24:32:
>>>>>> error: 'IMB_CIPHER_SM4_GCM' undeclared
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have to drop this commit while pulling next-crypto in main.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find a solution.
>>>>>> I'm still advocating to merge the Arm fork.
>>>>> Hi Thomas, the root cause of the build failure on Arm is their 
>>>>> library
>>>>> fork which lags behind, being at 1.5 release which is at this point
>>>>> almost 3 years old.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only solution in this release cycle is to drop this patch and 
>>>>> rebase
>>>>> the ones adding support for 3.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Considering Arm lack of support and contributions for these PMD 
>>>>> over the
>>>>> last couple of years, the only long term solution I see to avoid PMD
>>>>> code littered with ifdefs and supporting very old releases of the
>>>>> library is to drop the Arm version altogether.
>>>> No.
>>>> The only solution is to work with Arm.
>>> Indeed that would be the ideal solution.
>>>
>>> If anyone @Arm is still watching this space, please chip in.
>> Adding Arm folks
>
> Hi Thomas,
> We are looking into the  build issue and how best to resolve it.
> Also, would be happy to start a conversation on how we could work on a 
> combined fork.
>
> --wathsala

Hi Wathsala, can you have a look at the latest patches and ack them if 
all ok? The Arm compilation issue was resolved by removing the patch for 
minimum version, and all patches were rebased.

https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=39660

Thanks,
Radu