<div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:Arial"><div style="margin: 0;">Hi, Stephen, Min Hu,</div><div style="margin: 0;"> I will fix the issues.</div><div style="margin: 0;">Thanks.</div><div style="margin: 0;"> Gaoxiang.</div><pre>At 2022-03-09 10:53:15, "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
>Hi, Stephen,
>
>ÔÚ 2022/3/9 9:25, Stephen Hemminger дµÀ:
>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 22:24:02 +0800
>> Gaoxiang Liu <gaoxiangliu0@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>> index 1e7a3c1527..fa15ed710f 100644
>>> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
>>> extern "C" {
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#define RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER 1.5
>>
>> Why is a magic number from bonding ending up in the user API for mempool?
>Yes, I suggest putting the macro(name should be changed) in bonding. No
>need to define a new RTE_* macro in mempool.
>By the way, the RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER is the same as
>CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER already defined in rte_mempool.c.
>
>
>> .
>>
</pre></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><p> </p></span>