<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.dpdk.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" class="bz_new_table">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - IPv4 FIB 0.0.0.0/0 route doesn't work when first route added to FIB and using TBL24_8"
href="https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160">1160</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>IPv4 FIB 0.0.0.0/0 route doesn't work when first route added to FIB and using TBL24_8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>DPDK
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>22.11
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>x86
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Linux
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>Normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>other
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>dev@dpdk.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>gareth235711@googlemail.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Target Milestone</th>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div class="bz_comment_block">
<pre class="bz_comment_text">I think there's an issue with rte_fib which occurs when both of the following
conditions are met:
1. A route of 0.0.0.0/0 is the first route added to the FIB
2. The FIB is configured with type RTE_FIB_DIR24_8
Under these conditions, rte_fib_add returns with no error but subsequent
lookups that should hit the 0.0.0.0/0 route (and miss all others) return the
default next hop from the FIB config, not the next hop specified when adding
the 0.0.0.0/0.
If another route with a longer prefix is added first, the 0.0.0.0/0 route works
as expected.
void test0(void) {
struct rte_fib_conf config = {
.max_routes = 1024,
.rib_ext_sz = 0,
.default_nh = 0xDEFA,
.type = RTE_FIB_DIR24_8, /* test passes for RTE_FIB_DUMMY */
.dir24_8.num_tbl8 = 256,
.dir24_8.nh_sz = RTE_FIB_DIR24_8_4B,
};
struct rte_fib* fib = rte_fib_create("test-fib0", rte_socket_id(),
&config);
RTE_ASSERT(fib);
int ret;
/* works as expected if we add another route before the default route */
//ret = rte_fib_add(fib, RTE_IPV4(192,168,0,0), 24, 0x1);
//RTE_ASSERT(0 == ret);
uint64_t next_hop;
uint32_t ip = RTE_IPV4(10,0,0,1);
ret = rte_fib_lookup_bulk(fib, &ip, &next_hop, 1);
RTE_ASSERT(0 == ret);
RTE_ASSERT(next_hop == 0xDEFA);
ret = rte_fib_add(fib, RTE_IPV4(0,0,0,0), 0, 0x1);
RTE_ASSERT(0 == ret);
ret = rte_fib_lookup_bulk(fib, &ip, &next_hop, 1);
RTE_ASSERT(0 == ret);
printf("nh: 0x%"PRIx64"\n", next_hop);
RTE_ASSERT(next_hop == 1); /* assertion fail */
}
</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
<link itemprop="url" href="https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160">
<meta itemprop="name" content="View bug">
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="Bugzilla bug update notification">
</div>
</body>
</html>