<div>Thanks, I'll check it out.</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 3:04 PM Stephen Hemminger <<a href="mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org">stephen@networkplumber.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 12:44:06 -0800<br>
Bili Dong <<a href="mailto:qobilidop@gmail.com" target="_blank">qobilidop@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi Cristian,<br>
> <br>
> I agree the 64-bit version could enable better performance, and I will do<br>
> it in the next version.<br>
> <br>
<br>
Same optimizations as ipv4 checksum probably apply.<br>
Aligning data, and duffs device, etc.<br>
<br>
You might even be able to use vector instructions<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>