<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"> <style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style> </head> <body dir="ltr"> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Hi <a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net" id="OWAAM249121" class="x_tWKOu x_mention x_ms-bgc-nlr x_ms-fcl-b"> Thomas Monjalon</a> and Team,</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> I hope you are doing well.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> I wanted to follow up on my earlier request regarding the review of the fix for the DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 compilation issues, which was expected to be available in a future DPDK release.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Could you please confirm when the fix is likely to be available and in which upcoming release, we can expect it?</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Thanks & Regards,</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Reema Sharma</div> <hr style="direction: ltr; display: inline-block; width: 98%;"> <div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" class="elementToProof"> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <b>From:</b> Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com><br> <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 26, 2026 2:16 PM<br> <b>To:</b> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net><br> <b>Cc:</b> dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; gakhil@marvell.com <gakhil@marvell.com>; david.marchand@redhat.com <david.marchand@redhat.com>; stephen@networkplumber.org <stephen@networkplumber.org>; anatoly.burakov@intel.com <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>; gakhil@marvell.com <gakhil@marvell.com>; fanzhang.oss@gmail.com <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>; kai.ji@intel.com <kai.ji@intel.com>; Prakash Durgapal <Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com>; Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com>; Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com>; Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com><br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr;"> </div> </div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Hi <a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net" id="OWAAM141401" class="x_x_tWKOu x_x_mention x_x_ms-bgc-nlr x_x_ms-fcl-b"> Thomas Monjalon</a>,</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Thanks for the quick response.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Yes, you understood correctly. I encountered two issues while compiling a C++ application(Radisys CU module) linked with DPDK.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <b>Compiler Version: </b>gcc version 11.4.0 (ubuntu 22.04.3)</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <b>Regarding </b><code><b>rte_bitops.h</b></code><b>:</b><br> Disabling the macros works for my current use case, so I can proceed with that approach for now.<br> I agree that the behaviour of the <code>__RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD</code> macros needs further analysis, It will be great if fix for this will be available in next DPDK release. Please find the error details for your reference:</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> dpdk/dpdk-25.11/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_bitops.h:1468:1: error: conflicting declaration of C function ‘bool rte_bit_test(const volatile uint32_t*, unsigned int)’</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> 1468 | rte_bit_ ## family ## fun(qualifier uint ## size ## _t *addr, arg1_type arg1_name) \</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> | ^~~~~~~~</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> dpdk/dpdk-25.11/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_bitops.h:1468:1: note: in definition of macro ‘__RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD_V_2R’</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> 1468 | rte_bit_ ## family ## fun(qualifier uint ## size ## _t *addr, arg1_type arg1_name) \</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> | ^~~~~~~~</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> dpdk/dpdk-25.11/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_bitops.h:1479:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD_SZ_2R’</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> 1479 | __RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD_SZ_2R(family, fun, qualifier, 32, ret_type, arg1_type, arg1_name) \</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <b>Regarding </b><code><b>rte_cryptodev.h</b></code><b>:</b><br> This issue is not observed with DPDK 25.11. Please disregard the earlier report.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Thanks & Regards,</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Reema Sharma</div> <hr style="direction: ltr; display: inline-block; width: 98%;"> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <b>From:</b> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net><br> <b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, March 25, 2026 1:47 PM<br> <b>To:</b> Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com><br> <b>Cc:</b> dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; gakhil@marvell.com <gakhil@marvell.com>; david.marchand@redhat.com <david.marchand@redhat.com>; stephen@networkplumber.org <stephen@networkplumber.org>; anatoly.burakov@intel.com <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>; gakhil@marvell.com <gakhil@marvell.com>; fanzhang.oss@gmail.com <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>; kai.ji@intel.com <kai.ji@intel.com>; Prakash Durgapal <Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com>; Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com>; Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com>; Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com><br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <br> </div> <div class="elementToProof" style="direction: ltr; font-size: 11pt;">Hello,<br> <br> If I understand well, you hit 2 issues while compiling a C++ app linked with DPDK?<br> Could you share the exact version of your compiler?<br> <br> For rte_bitops.h, if disabling these macros is OK for you, go with it for now.<br> We will need to understand what happens exactly with __RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD macros.<br> <br> For rte_cryptodev.h, it may be hiding an issue somewhere else.<br> Please could you share the exact error message?<br> <br> <br> <br> 25/03/2026 07:55, Reema Sharma:<br> > Hi Team,<br> ><br> > Could you please review the attached DPDK patch (dpdk-24.11_patch_for_crypto.patch) and confirm whether the applied fixes are acceptable from the DPDK perspective?<br> > Your guidance on the correct fix, if any changes are needed, would help us proceed with CU compilation.<br> > Kindly share an update at your earliest convenience.<br> > Thanks & Regards,<br> > Reema Sharma<br> > ________________________________<br> > From: Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 3:26 PM<br> > To: Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com>; Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com><br> > Cc: Prakash Durgapal <Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com><br> > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> > Thanks Liheng,<br> ><br> > Just got other info that, you can contact DPDK directly through this mail: dev@dpdk.org<<a href="mailto:dev@dpdk.org" id="OWA064d7e4c-1917-269a-263a-55f49fa3f96d" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:dev@dpdk.org</a>>, but the response may be slow.<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > BRs,<br> ><br> > Tanghong<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > From: Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 5:51 PM<br> > To: Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>; Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com><br> > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash <prakash.durgapal@radisys.com>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com><br> > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Yes, there is a file “MAINTAINERS” in the DPDK root path.<br> ><br> > The file list all the contactor for all dpdk libraries.<br> ><br> > You can search and contact the person for crypto issue.<br> ><br> > If you can’t find it, please let me know, I can forward to you.<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > From: Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com<mailto:Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 5:45 PM<br> > To: Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com<mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com>>; Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com<mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com>>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com<mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com>><br> > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash <prakash.durgapal@radisys.com<mailto:prakash.durgapal@radisys.com>>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com<mailto:Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com<mailto:Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com<mailto:Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>><br> > Subject: Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Hi Zhang, Liheng<<a href="mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com" id="OWA32f2243d-70d3-70df-9dc2-709ab965e29f" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com</a>>,<br> ><br> > We have verified the behaviour on CU side and confirmed that this is not caused by our code. The issue appears to be related to a DPDK bug.<br> ><br> > At the moment, we do not have any contact information for the DPDK maintainers.<br> > Could you please check internally and share the relevant maintainer details or forward this issue on behalf of Radisys?<br> ><br> > Thanks & Regards,<br> ><br> > Reema Sharma<br> ><br> > ________________________________<br> ><br> > From: Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com<mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com>><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 2:49 PM<br> > To: Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com<mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com>>; Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com<mailto:Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com<mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com>><br> > Cc: Prakash Durgapal <Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com<mailto:Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com>>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com<mailto:Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com<mailto:Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com<mailto:Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>><br> > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.<br> ><br> > Hi Reema<br> ><br> > Looks the changes are ok, but you need verify them by compiling your code.<br> ><br> > As I know, the following are the better procedures for DPDK bug fix:<br> ><br> > 1. Please first confirm the error are not related to your own code before changing DPDK code;<br> > 2. If it is real DPDK bug, you need contact the according DPDK maintainer to fix it;<br> > 3. Finally DPDK maintainer will provide an official patch;<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > From: Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com<mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com>><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 3:52 PM<br> > To: Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com<mailto:Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com<mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com>>; Zhang, Liheng <liheng.zhang@intel.com<mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com>><br> > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash <prakash.durgapal@radisys.com<mailto:prakash.durgapal@radisys.com>>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com<mailto:Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com<mailto:Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com<mailto:Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>><br> > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Hello Reema,<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Sorry for late reply, copy @Zhang, Liheng<<a href="mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com" id="OWA4e660360-51e5-a932-9996-7e19cd04ac34" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:liheng.zhang@intel.com</a>> here for comment, thanks Liheng in advance.<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > BRs,<br> ><br> > Tanghong<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > From: Reema Sharma <Reema.Sharma@radisys.com<mailto:Reema.Sharma@radisys.com>><br> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 1:41 PM<br> > To: Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com<mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com>>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com<mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com>><br> > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash <prakash.durgapal@radisys.com<mailto:prakash.durgapal@radisys.com>>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com<mailto:Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com<mailto:Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com<mailto:Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>><br> > Subject: Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Hi Xiong, Tanghong<<a href="mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com" id="OWA5546813b-16ab-5eee-1e68-a2d1526fd823" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com</a>>/ Liu1, Kai<<a href="mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com" id="OWA47342f7e-3499-54e9-e263-a06d84425467" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com</a>>,<br> ><br> > Hope you are doing well.<br> ><br> > I am writing to check if there is any update on the pending DPDK issue raised in this mail.<br> > Could you please share the latest status, or let me know if any additional inputs are required from my side to help move this forward?<br> ><br> > Looking forward to your response.<br> ><br> > Thanks & Regards,<br> ><br> > Reema Sharma<br> ><br> > ________________________________<br> ><br> > From: Reema Sharma<br> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 11:27 AM<br> > To: Xiong, Tanghong <tanghong.xiong@intel.com<mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com>>; Liu1, Kai <kai.liu1@intel.com<mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com>><br> > Cc: Prakash Durgapal <Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com<mailto:Prakash.Durgapal@radisys.com>>; Pratap Rana <Pratap.Rana@radisys.com<mailto:Pratap.Rana@radisys.com>>; Vijay Kumar Mahto <Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com<mailto:Vijay.Mahto@radisys.com>>; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya <Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com<mailto:Jaydipkumar.Dhameliya@radisys.com>><br> > Subject: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Hi Xiong, Tanghong<<a href="mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com" id="OWA7c5507a7-9cf6-cdf1-aef7-bcc3c5ee1fa6" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:tanghong.xiong@intel.com</a>>/ Liu1, Kai<<a href="mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com" id="OWA7ded1914-e6a5-2ee9-68f1-dca1595780c8" class="x_x_OWAAutoLink">mailto:kai.liu1@intel.com</a>>,<br> ><br> > While compiling the CU with DPDK 24.11 and DPDK 25.11, we encountered the following two errors:<br> ><br> > 1. Conflicting type definitions in the DPDK header file rte_bitops.h<br> ><br> > [cid:image001.png@01DCAD92.9C6111F0]<br> ><br> > 1. “template with C linkage” error in the DPDK header file rte_cryptodev.h<br> ><br> > To proceed with our CU compilation, we applied the required fixes in the respective DPDK include files and generated a patch named dpdk-24.11_patch_for_crypto.patch. The updated changes are included in the attached patch file for your review.<br> ><br> > Could you please review these changes from the DPDK side and confirm whether they are acceptable, or advise on the correct fix if modifications are required?<br> ><br> > Thanks & Regards,<br> > Reema Sharma<br> ><br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> </div> </body> </html>