<div dir="ltr">Hello,Thank you for the detailed review. I am reworking the series as an RFC for the EAL DMA API and PCI bus hook, with igb as the first user.DMA properties now come from each device’s host bridge, and cache handling is in EAL. I will also revise RX buffer reuse, TX completion, and descriptor ownership, and add separate burst functions for non-coherent DMA.I will also remove the extra guide and shorten the comments.Best regards, Rayhan</div> <div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 11:42 AM Stephen Hemminger <<a href="mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org">stephen@networkplumber.org</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:56:17 +0100 Bruce Richardson <<a href="mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com" target="_blank">bruce.richardson@intel.com</a>> wrote: > > > > Short observations: > > 1. Too much AI generated slop, extra docs, comments on everything. > > New code should look like the surrounding code. > > This looks like AI wasn't quite sure and left lots of docs for future self. > > I really don't view this as a bad thing. A little too much detail in the > comments is better for the future than too little. Given these patches > touch areas outside the usual behaviour we expect from DPDK platforms, > having extra comments is definitely useful. > > > /Bruce There is a fine line between a couple of sentences and three paragraphs </blockquote></div>