[spp] [PATCH 1/3] spp_vf: fix wrong master lcore other than 0
yasufum.o at gmail.com
yasufum.o at gmail.com
Thu Jul 18 07:01:17 CEST 2019
From: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o at gmail.com>
Master lcore of spp_vf is always set as 0 and cannot to others. It is
because rte_get_master_lcore() returns 0 if it is called before
rte_eal_init(). This update is to move rte_eal_init() before.
Fixes: 310c51b918e9 ("spp_vf: initialize variable master_lcore")
Signed-off-by: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o at gmail.com>
---
src/vf/spp_vf.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/vf/spp_vf.c b/src/vf/spp_vf.c
index e2711d1..bc2a403 100644
--- a/src/vf/spp_vf.c
+++ b/src/vf/spp_vf.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ slave_main(void *arg __attribute__ ((unused)))
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
- int ret = SPP_RET_NG;
+ int ret;
char ctl_ip[IPADDR_LEN] = { 0 };
int ctl_port;
int ret_cmd_init;
@@ -220,20 +220,24 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
signal(SIGTERM, stop_process);
signal(SIGINT, stop_process);
+ ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0))
+ rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid EAL arguments.\n");
+
+ argc -= ret;
+ argv += ret;
+
/**
* It should be initialized outside of while loop, or failed to
* compile because it is referred when finalize `g_core_info`.
*/
master_lcore = rte_get_master_lcore();
+ /**
+ * If any failure is occured in the while block, break to go the end
+ * of the block to finalize.
+ */
while (1) {
- int ret_dpdk = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
- if (unlikely(ret_dpdk < 0))
- break;
-
- argc -= ret_dpdk;
- argv += ret_dpdk;
-
/* Parse spp_vf specific parameters */
int ret_parse = parse_app_args(argc, argv);
if (unlikely(ret_parse != SPP_RET_OK))
--
2.17.1
More information about the spp
mailing list