[dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 1/2] ipc: fix memory leak in sync request

Herakliusz Lipiec herakliusz.lipiec at intel.com
Fri May 3 12:28:56 CEST 2019


When sending multiple requests, rte_mp_request_sync
can succeed sending a few of those requests, but then
fail on a later one and in the end return with rc=-1.
The upper layers - e.g. device hotplug - currently
handles this case as if no messages were sent and no
memory for response buffers was allocated, which is
not true. Fixed by always freeing memory buffers on
failure.

Bugzilla ID: 228
Fixes: 783b6e54971d ("eal: add synchronous multi-process communication")
Cc: jianfeng.tan at intel.com
Cc: stable at dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Herakliusz Lipiec <herakliusz.lipiec at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
index b46d644b3..ef5eddbea 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
@@ -927,13 +927,13 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 
 	RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "request: %s\n", req->name);
 
-	if (check_input(req) == false)
-		return -1;
-
 	reply->nb_sent = 0;
 	reply->nb_received = 0;
 	reply->msgs = NULL;
 
+	if (check_input(req) == false)
+		goto err;
+
 	if (internal_config.no_shconf) {
 		RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "No shared files mode enabled, IPC is disabled\n");
 		return 0;
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) < 0) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to get current time\n");
 		rte_errno = errno;
-		return -1;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	end.tv_nsec = (now.tv_usec * 1000 + ts->tv_nsec) % 1000000000;
@@ -954,6 +954,8 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 		pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
 		ret = mp_request_sync(eal_mp_socket_path(), req, reply, &end);
 		pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err;
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -962,7 +964,7 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 	if (!mp_dir) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Unable to open directory %s\n", mp_dir_path);
 		rte_errno = errno;
-		return -1;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	dir_fd = dirfd(mp_dir);
@@ -972,7 +974,7 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 			mp_dir_path);
 		closedir(mp_dir);
 		rte_errno = errno;
-		return -1;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
@@ -989,7 +991,7 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 		 * locks on receive
 		 */
 		if (mp_request_sync(path, req, reply, &end))
-			ret = -1;
+			goto err;
 	}
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
 	/* unlock the directory */
@@ -998,6 +1000,12 @@ rte_mp_request_sync(struct rte_mp_msg *req, struct rte_mp_reply *reply,
 	/* dir_fd automatically closed on closedir */
 	closedir(mp_dir);
 	return ret;
+
+err:
+	free(reply->msgs);
+	reply->nb_received = 0;
+	reply->msgs = NULL;
+	return -1;
 }
 
 int __rte_experimental
-- 
2.17.2



More information about the stable mailing list