[dpdk-stable] [PATCH 18.11] examples/multi_process: fix compilation

[Olivier Matz]

Fix compilation of examples/multi_process:

> examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c:68:4: error:
> implicit declaration of function ‘rte_ether_format_addr’;
> did you mean ‘ether_format_addr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     rte_ether_format_addr(err_address,
>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This failure happens after the backport of
commit a7500412fc5c ("examples/multi_process: fix build on Ubuntu
20.04"), which uses a function that does not exist in this branch. The
function was introduced by upstream commit 538da7a1cad2 ("net: add rte
prefix to ether functions"), and is just a renaming of an existing
function.

Fixes: a7500412fc5c ("examples/multi_process: fix build on Ubuntu 20.04")

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
---
 examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c b/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c
index 1a5bf534ff..62abd62cf3 100644
--- a/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c
+++ b/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/main.c
@@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ get_printable_mac_addr(uint16_t port)
 
 	if (unlikely(port >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS)) {
 		if (err_address[0] == '\0')
-			rte_ether_format_addr(err_address,
+			ether_format_addr(err_address,
 					sizeof(err_address), &null_mac);
 		return err_address;
 	}
 	if (unlikely(addresses[port][0]=='\0')){
 		struct ether_addr mac;
 		rte_eth_macaddr_get(port, &mac);
-		rte_ether_format_addr(addresses[port],
+		ether_format_addr(addresses[port],
 				sizeof(addresses[port]), &mac);
 	}
 	return addresses[port];
-- 
2.25.1