[dpdk-stable] patch 'net/bnxt: fix handling of null flow mask' has been queued to stable release 19.11.9

Christian Ehrhardt christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com
Mon May 17 18:08:07 CEST 2021


Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.9

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 05/19/21. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/919272fe90a0c072de83f8c7b6d82e38cfa2959d

Thanks.

Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>

---
>From 919272fe90a0c072de83f8c7b6d82e38cfa2959d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson at broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:52:51 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix handling of null flow mask

[ upstream commit dea1afc71ffce08fccef2d49f09f6ad874c433c5 ]

When the mask field of an rte_flow pattern item is NULL,
the default mask for that item type should be used.

Fixes: 5ef3b79fdfe6 ("net/bnxt: support flow filter ops")

Signed-off-by: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson at broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_flow.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_flow.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_flow.c
index f069e5f56a..fea35f53f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_flow.c
@@ -185,11 +185,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 				PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Parse inner header\n");
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH:
-			if (!item->spec || !item->mask)
+			if (!item->spec)
 				break;
 
 			eth_spec = item->spec;
-			eth_mask = item->mask;
+
+			if (item->mask)
+				eth_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				eth_mask = &rte_flow_item_eth_mask;
 
 			/* Source MAC address mask cannot be partially set.
 			 * Should be All 0's or all 1's.
@@ -278,7 +282,12 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN:
 			vlan_spec = item->spec;
-			vlan_mask = item->mask;
+
+			if (item->mask)
+				vlan_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				vlan_mask = &rte_flow_item_vlan_mask;
+
 			if (en & en_ethertype) {
 				rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						   RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
@@ -321,11 +330,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4:
 			/* If mask is not involved, we could use EM filters. */
 			ipv4_spec = item->spec;
-			ipv4_mask = item->mask;
 
-			if (!item->spec || !item->mask)
+			if (!item->spec)
 				break;
 
+			if (item->mask)
+				ipv4_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				ipv4_mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv4_mask;
+
 			/* Only IP DST and SRC fields are maskable. */
 			if (ipv4_mask->hdr.version_ihl ||
 			    ipv4_mask->hdr.type_of_service ||
@@ -382,11 +395,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6:
 			ipv6_spec = item->spec;
-			ipv6_mask = item->mask;
 
-			if (!item->spec || !item->mask)
+			if (!item->spec)
 				break;
 
+			if (item->mask)
+				ipv6_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				ipv6_mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv6_mask;
+
 			/* Only IP DST and SRC fields are maskable. */
 			if (ipv6_mask->hdr.vtc_flow ||
 			    ipv6_mask->hdr.payload_len ||
@@ -434,11 +451,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP:
 			tcp_spec = item->spec;
-			tcp_mask = item->mask;
 
-			if (!item->spec || !item->mask)
+			if (!item->spec)
 				break;
 
+			if (item->mask)
+				tcp_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				tcp_mask = &rte_flow_item_tcp_mask;
+
 			/* Check TCP mask. Only DST & SRC ports are maskable */
 			if (tcp_mask->hdr.sent_seq ||
 			    tcp_mask->hdr.recv_ack ||
@@ -479,11 +500,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP:
 			udp_spec = item->spec;
-			udp_mask = item->mask;
 
-			if (!item->spec || !item->mask)
+			if (!item->spec)
 				break;
 
+			if (item->mask)
+				udp_mask = item->mask;
+			else
+				udp_mask = &rte_flow_item_udp_mask;
+
 			if (udp_mask->hdr.dgram_len ||
 			    udp_mask->hdr.dgram_cksum) {
 				rte_flow_error_set(error,
-- 
2.31.1

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2021-05-17 17:40:31.811026635 +0200
+++ 0058-net-bnxt-fix-handling-of-null-flow-mask.patch	2021-05-17 17:40:29.195809666 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From dea1afc71ffce08fccef2d49f09f6ad874c433c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 919272fe90a0c072de83f8c7b6d82e38cfa2959d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+[ upstream commit dea1afc71ffce08fccef2d49f09f6ad874c433c5 ]
+
@@ -10 +11,0 @@
-Cc: stable at dpdk.org
@@ -19 +20 @@
-index a8f5d91fc4..e3906b4779 100644
+index f069e5f56a..fea35f53f8 100644
@@ -22 +23 @@
-@@ -188,11 +188,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -185,11 +185,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
@@ -40 +41 @@
-@@ -281,7 +285,12 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -278,7 +282,12 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
@@ -54 +55 @@
-@@ -324,11 +333,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -321,11 +330,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
@@ -72 +73 @@
-@@ -385,11 +398,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -382,11 +395,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
@@ -90 +91 @@
-@@ -437,11 +454,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -434,11 +451,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
@@ -108 +109 @@
-@@ -482,11 +503,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,
+@@ -479,11 +500,15 @@ bnxt_validate_and_parse_flow_type(struct bnxt *bp,


More information about the stable mailing list