[dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw23024 [PATCH v5 6/6] cfgfile: add support for empty value string

sys_stv at intel.com sys_stv at intel.com
Sun Apr 2 06:25:31 CEST 2017

Previous message: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw23023 [PATCH v5 5/6] cfgfile: increase local buffer size for max name and value
Next message: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw23025 [PATCH v3 1/3] net/tap: update netlink error code management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/23024

_apply patch file failure_

Submitter: Allain Legacy <allain.legacy at windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:52:03 -0400
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:40546b9f72d7367f2ee33c8061896e5c0e92f207
                   Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:3989a0933afab9d339ed9c6de258185d30bb7cb5
                   Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:a962e4db963d57c1c4c48e46716fc5a63a59542f
                   Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:26f5fd077415b94bb4aacd857d38ae25841f4fe7
                   Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:ba82829fda022e14a938c3a669de0e634626e4c8
                   
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
23024:
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 (offset -75 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 227 (offset -75 lines).
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 80.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 63
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|index 8eabd711c..4cc9b14dd 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 113
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|index 8f203ce3e..53284467b 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
23024:
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 (offset -75 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 227 (offset -75 lines).
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 80.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 63
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|index 8eabd711c..4cc9b14dd 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 113
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|index 8f203ce3e..53284467b 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Repo: dpdk-next-net
23024:
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 (offset -75 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 227 (offset -75 lines).
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 80.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 63
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|index 8eabd711c..4cc9b14dd 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 113
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|index 8f203ce3e..53284467b 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
23024:
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 (offset -75 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 227 (offset -75 lines).
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 80.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 63
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|index 8eabd711c..4cc9b14dd 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 113
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|index 8f203ce3e..53284467b 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
23024:
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 (offset -75 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 227 (offset -75 lines).
patching file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 80.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 63
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|index 8eabd711c..4cc9b14dd 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfile.c
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 113
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|index 8f203ce3e..53284467b 100644
|--- a/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
|+++ b/test/test/test_cfgfiles/etc/empty_key_value.ini
--------------------------
File to patch: 
Skip this patch? [y] 
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored


DPDK STV team

Previous message: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw23023 [PATCH v5 5/6] cfgfile: increase local buffer size for max name and value
Next message: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw23025 [PATCH v3 1/3] net/tap: update netlink error code management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the test-report mailing list