[dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw21694 [PATCH v4 17/17] app/test: add unit tests for SW eventdev driver
sys_stv at intel.com
sys_stv at intel.com
Sat Mar 11 00:01:04 CET 2017
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/21694
_Compilation issues_
Submitter: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:43:17 +0000
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:720dbd63fd5083f8cacd6c59aa3f2651121d562a
Patch21678-21694 --> compile error
Build Summary: 18 Builds Done, 5 Successful, 13 Failures
Test environment and configuration as below:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Clang Version:3.4.2
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Kernel Version:10.3-RELEASE
CPU info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz (2194.97-MHz K8-class CPU)
GCC Version:gcc (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 4.8.5
Clang Version:3.4.1
x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
OS: FC24_64
Kernel Version:4.9.13-100.fc24.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)
Clang Version:3.8.0
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-debug
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
OS: UB1604_64
Kernel Version:4.4.0-64-generic
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
Clang Version:3.8.0
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
OS: CentOS7_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Clang Version:3.4.2
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
Failed Build #1:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_print’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:132:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:147:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:162:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:938:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:938:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:956:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:956:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:994:4: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
__func__, __LINE__, ret, RTE_DIM(port_expected));
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1001:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], port_expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1001:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1034:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], port_expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1034:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1067:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], queue_expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1067:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1097:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], queue_expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1097:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_id_reset_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1486:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1504:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1504:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1608:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
port_expected[i], id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1625:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
port_expected_zero[i], val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1625:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1719:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
queue_expected[i], id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1736:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
queue_expected_zero[i], val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1736:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #2:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #3:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #4:
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Target: x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
PMDINFO sw_evdev.o.pmd.c LD sw_evdev.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:224:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const port_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:241:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const qid_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
2 errors generated.
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'sw_evdev_xstats.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'sw' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'event' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #5:
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Target: x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field 'rsvd' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: 'rsvd' declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'run_prio_packet_test':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field 'impl_opaque' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: 'impl_opaque' declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field 'impl_opaque' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: 'impl_opaque' declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field 'impl_opaque' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: 'impl_opaque' declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'test_single_directed_packet':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'burst_packets':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'load_balancing':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'load_balancing_history':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field 'sub_event_type' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: 'sub_event_type' declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field 'rsvd' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: 'rsvd' declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field 'impl_opaque' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: 'impl_opaque' declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field 'sub_event_type' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: 'sub_event_type' declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field 'rsvd' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: 'rsvd' declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field 'impl_opaque' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: 'impl_opaque' declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'invalid_qid':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function 'worker_loopback_producer_fn':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field 'priority' of 'struct <anonymous>' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: 'priority' declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'test_eventdev_sw.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'test' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #6:
OS: FC24_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_print’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:131:24: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:146:24: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:161:24: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:936:39: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:936:51: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:954:40: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:954:52: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:993:62: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%s %d: wrong number of port stats (%d), expected %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:999:40: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%s : %d: Error stat %s is %ld, expected %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:999:54: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%s : %d: Error stat %s is %ld, expected %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1032:41: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1032:53: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1065:41: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1065:53: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1095:41: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1095:53: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_id_reset_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1484:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1502:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1502:55: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1606:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1623:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1623:55: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1717:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1734:47: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1734:55: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'test_eventdev_sw.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'test' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #7:
OS: FC24_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
PMDINFO sw_evdev.o.pmd.c LD sw_evdev.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:224:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const port_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:241:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const qid_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
2 errors generated.
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'sw_evdev_xstats.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'sw' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'event' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #8:
OS: UB1604_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_print’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:131:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:146:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:161:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d : %s : %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:936:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:936:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:954:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:954:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:993:10: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%s %d: wrong number of port stats (%d), expected %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:999:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%s : %d: Error stat %s is %ld, expected %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:999:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1032:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1032:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1065:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1065:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1095:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
"%d, Error, xstat %d (id %d) %s : %ld, expect %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1095:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t {aka const long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_id_reset_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1484:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1502:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1502:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1606:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1623:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1623:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1717:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %d\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1734:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf("%d: %s value incorrect, expected %ld got %ld\n",
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1734:11: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'test_eventdev_sw.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'test' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #9:
OS: UB1604_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
PMDINFO sw_evdev.o.pmd.c LD sw_evdev.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:224:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const port_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:241:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const qid_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
2 errors generated.
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'sw_evdev_xstats.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'sw' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61: recipe for target 'event' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:78: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:101: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #10:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_print’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:132:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:147:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:162:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
i, xstats_names[i].name, values[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:938:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:938:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:956:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:956:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:994:4: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
__func__, __LINE__, ret, RTE_DIM(port_expected));
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1001:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], port_expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1001:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1034:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], port_expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1034:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1067:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], queue_expected[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1067:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1097:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
values[i], queue_expected_zero[i]);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1097:5: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘xstats_id_reset_tests’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1486:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1504:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1504:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1608:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
port_expected[i], id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1625:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
port_expected_zero[i], val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1625:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1719:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
queue_expected[i], id);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1736:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
queue_expected_zero[i], val);
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1736:6: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/i686-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #11:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
PMDINFO sw_evdev.o.pmd.c LD sw_evdev.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:224:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const port_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_xstats.c:241:23: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror,-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
static const uint8_t const qid_reset_allowed[] = {1, 1, 1,
^
2 errors generated.
Failed Build #12:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #13:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
MKRES test_resource_c.res.o/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:67:15: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static struct rte_event release_ev = {.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE };
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘run_prio_packet_test’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:406:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:407:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:408:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘test_single_directed_packet’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:490:4: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘burst_packets’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:684:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i % 3,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:685:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1920:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = flows[i],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:1921:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘load_balancing_history’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2011:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2012:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2013:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2014:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2015:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2060:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘sub_event_type’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:919:13: note: ‘sub_event_type’ declared here
uint32_t sub_event_type:8;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2061:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘rsvd’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.queue_id = t->qid[0],
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:933:12: note: ‘rsvd’ declared here
uint8_t rsvd:4;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2062:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2063:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.priority = RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2064:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘impl_opaque’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:957:12: note: ‘impl_opaque’ declared here
uint8_t impl_opaque;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘invalid_qid’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2179:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = i,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2180:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = arp,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c: In function ‘worker_loopback_producer_fn’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2863:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.flow_id = (uintptr_t)m & 0xFFFF,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:2864:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘priority’ of ‘struct <anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
.mbuf = m,
^
In file included from /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test/test_eventdev_sw.c:51:0:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_eventdev.h:947:12: note: ‘priority’ declared here
uint8_t priority;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
DPDK STV team
More information about the test-report
mailing list