[dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw38568 [PATCH v2 7/8] net/sfc: factor out RSS fields from adapter info

sys_stv at intel.com sys_stv at intel.com
Thu May 3 13:13:21 CEST 2018


Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/38568

_apply patch file failure_

Submitter: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:41:50 +0100
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:fcde84b5f85b3c1a5d5564299fd49c58ca20370d
                   Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:211992f3b7df5d6d8f1dbefc48bc37a6d5398fbc
                   Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:60ed72ac5eb5daf57bb19663b0a9aa3a4812487f
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
38568:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 531 with fuzz 2 (offset -109 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 655.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 667.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 169 with fuzz 1 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 232.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
15 out of 15 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1250.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1269.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1284.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1292.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1372.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1391.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1411.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1430.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
12 out of 12 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej

Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
38568:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 531 with fuzz 2 (offset -109 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 655.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 667.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 169 with fuzz 1 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 232.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
15 out of 15 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1250.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1269.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1284.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1292.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1372.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1391.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1411.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1430.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
12 out of 12 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej

Repo: dpdk-next-net
38568:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 531 with fuzz 2 (offset -109 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 655.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 667.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 169 with fuzz 1 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 232.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
15 out of 15 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1250.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1269.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1284.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1292.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1372.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1391.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1411.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1430.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
12 out of 12 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej

Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
38568:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1250.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1269.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1284.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1292.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1340 (offset -32 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1360 (offset -32 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1380 (offset -32 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1399 (offset -32 lines).
4 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c

Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
38568:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 531 with fuzz 2 (offset -109 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 655.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 667.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 169 with fuzz 1 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 232.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
15 out of 15 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1250.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1269.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1284.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1292.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1372.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1391.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1411.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1430.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.
12 out of 12 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej


DPDK STV team


More information about the test-report mailing list