[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw73980 [PATCH v4 04/11] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enum

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/73980

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'?
#82: 
The terms blacklist and whitelist are often seen as reminders

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'?
#82: 
The terms blacklist and whitelist are often seen as reminders

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'?
#90: 
The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'?
#90: 
The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'WHITELIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'ALLOWLIST'?
#153: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:223:
+#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_WHITELIST  RTE_BUS_SCAN_ALLOWLIST

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'BLACKLIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'BLOCKLIST'?
#154: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:224:
+#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLACKLIST	RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLOCKLIST

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'compatiablity' may be misspelled - perhaps 'compatibility'?
#173: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_dev.h:77:
+/* Backwards compatiablity will be deprecated */

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'compatiablity' may be misspelled - perhaps 'compatibility'?
#195: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_devargs.h:37:
+/* Backwards compatiablity will be removed later */

total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 76 lines checked