[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw74147 [PATCH v5 4/9] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enum

checkpatch at dpdk.org checkpatch at dpdk.org
Thu Jul 16 01:05:08 CEST 2020


Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/74147

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'?
#65: 
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/9] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'?
#65: 
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/9] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'?
#81: 
The terms blacklist and whitelist are often seen as reminders

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'?
#81: 
The terms blacklist and whitelist are often seen as reminders

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'?
#89: 
The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'?
#89: 
The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'WHITELIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'ALLOWLIST'?
#155: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:223:
+#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_WHITELIST  RTE_BUS_SCAN_ALLOWLIST

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'BLACKLIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'BLOCKLIST'?
#156: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:224:
+#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLACKLIST	RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLOCKLIST

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'compatiablity' may be misspelled - perhaps 'compatibility'?
#175: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_dev.h:77:
+/* Backwards compatiablity will be deprecated */

total: 0 errors, 9 warnings, 76 lines checked


More information about the test-report mailing list