[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw87848 [v2 PATCH] doc: replace testpmd with dpdk-testpmd in all commands

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/87848

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#130: FILE: doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst:850:
+    dpdk-testpmd -l 0-3 -n4 --vdev 'net_bonding0,mode=0,slave=<PCI B:D.F device 1>,slave=<PCI B:D.F device 2>,mac=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX’ – --socket_num=1 – -i --port-topology=chained

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#130: FILE: doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst:850:
+    dpdk-testpmd -l 0-3 -n4 --vdev 'net_bonding0,mode=0,slave=<PCI B:D.F device 1>,slave=<PCI B:D.F device 2>,mac=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX’ – --socket_num=1 – -i --port-topology=chained

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#131: FILE: doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst:851:
+    (ex) dpdk-testpmd -l 1,3,5,7,9 -n4 --vdev 'net_bonding0,mode=0,slave=0000:82:00.0,slave=0000:82:00.1,mac=00:1e:67:1d:fd:1d' – --socket-num=1 – -i --port-topology=chained

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#131: FILE: doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst:851:
+    (ex) dpdk-testpmd -l 1,3,5,7,9 -n4 --vdev 'net_bonding0,mode=0,slave=0000:82:00.0,slave=0000:82:00.1,mac=00:1e:67:1d:fd:1d' – --socket-num=1 – -i --port-topology=chained

total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 90 lines checked