[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw87924 [PATCH 3/5] pipeline: support non-incremental table updates

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/87924

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'peding' may be misspelled - perhaps 'pending'?
#76: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:607:
+table_is_update_pending(struct table *table, int consider_peding_default)

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'peding' may be misspelled - perhaps 'pending'?
#94: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:625:
+	if (consider_peding_default && table->pending_default)

WARNING:UNNECESSARY_ELSE: else is not generally useful after a break or return
#245: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:1231:
+		return 0;
+	} else {

WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 103 exceeds 100 columns
#257: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:1243:
+			status = table_entry_list_duplicate(ctl, table_id, &list, &table->pending_add);

WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 107 exceeds 100 columns
#261: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:1247:
+			status = table_entry_list_duplicate(ctl, table_id, &list, &table->pending_modify1);

WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 114 exceeds 100 columns
#266: FILE: lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c:1252:
+			ts_next->obj = table->ops.create(&table->params, &list, table->info.args, ctl->numa_node);

total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 328 lines checked