|WARNING| pw118945 [PATCH v2] app/test-security-perf: add security perf app

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/118945

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#506: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:342:
+	uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_mid, tsc_end, tsc_setup_dur, tsc_destroy_dur;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#506: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:342:
+	uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_mid, tsc_end, tsc_setup_dur, tsc_destroy_dur;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#561: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:397:
+	tsc_setup_dur = tsc_mid - tsc_start;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#562: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:398:
+	tsc_destroy_dur = tsc_end - tsc_mid;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#564: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:400:
+	setup_ms = tsc_setup_dur * 1000 / rte_get_tsc_hz();

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#565: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:401:
+	destroy_ms = tsc_destroy_dur * 1000 / rte_get_tsc_hz();

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#567: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:403:
+	setup_rate = (double)nb_sessions * rte_get_tsc_hz() / tsc_setup_dur;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dur' may be misspelled - perhaps 'due'?
#568: FILE: app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c:404:
+	destroy_rate = (double)nb_sessions * rte_get_tsc_hz() / tsc_destroy_dur;

total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 673 lines checked