|WARNING| pw164747 [PATCH] ring: avoid extra store at move head

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/164747

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'CAS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CASE'?
#55: 
parameter: 'uint32_t *old_head' directly within CAS operation.
                                                ^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'CAS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CASE'?
#57: 
store return value of CAS (eax) within 'old_head' memory location,
                      ^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'CAS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CASE'?
#58: 
even when CAS was not successful and another attempt should be
          ^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'CAS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CASE'?
#66: 
.L1: // <---- successful completion of CAS, finish
                                       ^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'CAS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CASE'?
#69: 
.L17: // <---- unsuccessful completion of CAS, repeat
                                          ^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'constrast' may be misspelled - perhaps 'contrast'?
#73: 
In constrast, x86 specific version that uses
   ^^^^^^^^^

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'updaing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'updating'?
#79: 
and updaing '*old_head' value only at exit.
    ^^^^^^^

total: 0 errors, 7 warnings, 68 lines checked