[dpdk-users] Is PF-only driver allowed to upstream into dpdk?
vincent.jardin at 6wind.com
Mon Feb 13 23:14:36 CET 2017
>> I am currently working on a non-nic mode user space PCI driver
>> which processes custom packets from OCTEON 7xxx processor. As
>> per the requirements, DPDK is the best way to achieve this.
>> Though I have seen few designs and sources that talk about dpdk
>> pf drivers, I am interested to know if such a driver with pf-only
>> support and which doesn't involve virtual functions will be allowed
>> to upstream into DPDK sources.
> There is no problem with PF only drivers, and there are already samples
> of it in the project.
> As long as driver is open source and for data path, it is good for
> upstream. Please feel free to upstream your driver when it is ready.
> The discussion about DPDK PF drivers was about if DPDK PF driver should
> be in control path or not, this is high level project scope discussion.
It is about diverging with the Linux kernel's PF. It is not acceptable,
from a VF point of view to have different behaviors.
Then, about this specific request regarding Octeon's PF, your
description is not clear enough to comment deeply about it.
More information about the users