[dpdk-users] Why DPDK latency is high when sending message in interval?
stephen at networkplumber.org
Mon Oct 29 16:23:39 CET 2018
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:07:02 +0100
Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you don't care about CPU utilization, busy-wait is the way to go.
> Otherwise you can try to usleep() for something like 60-70 us (to lower the
> CPU utilization), and then busy-wait for the rest of the interval (so that
> you still have maximum precision).
> You may want to have a look at this
> https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/61/6/808/4259797 , specially
> sections 4.3 and 4.1.
> Il giorno dom 28 ott 2018 alle ore 09:01 Sungho Hong <
> maverickjin88 at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > Thank you very much for the reply.
> > But in that case, should I busy wait, to create the delay?
If doing very brief and exact sleep, you should change your thread priority to
one of the Real Time classes.
More information about the users