[dpdk-users] Same port receive/transmit loopback
Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen
zain2294 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 19:25:57 CET 2020
Kindly share what you are sending vs what you are receiving and some more
detail on the environment configuration
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020, 10:13 AM Dominic Chen <d.c.ddcc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've verified with testpmd that the connection works. Since I'm in a
> virtual machine, I don't have a physical cable to loopback, so I added
> more virtual NICs and bridged them externally. I've also submitted a
> patch to the e1000 driver to add support for loopback mode. I don't have
> the physical hardware, so I can only verify that it works in QEMU with
> e1000 and e1000e.
>
> Dominic
>
> On 1/21/2020 12:47 AM, Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen wrote:
> > Hey there, have you used packetgen to verify. Build pktgen app and
> > loopback your cable to recieve what you send on the port to verify please
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 3:34 AM Dominic Chen <d.c.ddcc at gmail.com
> > <mailto:d.c.ddcc at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I've just started working with DPDK recently, and I'm a little
> > confused
> > by the intended behavior when transmitting and receiving on the
> > same port.
> >
> > Currently, I haven't been able to receive the same packet that I
> > transmitted, regardless of the source/destination MACs on the
> Ethernet
> > packet (broadcast, self, etc), or whether the port is in promiscuous
> > mode. I've verified from other hosts on the network that my
> > packets are
> > being sent, that I am able to receive packets (as long as I didn't
> > send
> > them), and that I get the same behavior when using vfio-pci with both
> > e1000 and vmxnet3 (emulated in VMware).
> >
> > Is there some built-in source MAC filtering that I'm missing? Or do I
> > have to enable loopback mode?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dominic
> >
> >
>
More information about the users
mailing list