[dpdk-users] Interrupt mode, queues, own event loop

Budiský Jakub ibudisky at fit.vutbr.cz
Tue Sep 8 17:09:12 CEST 2020


On 2020-09-05 23:21, Budiský Jakub wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the valuable info!
> 
> I've now switched to the `vfio` module even for testing and I can
> confirm I get a set of separate eventfd file descriptors. I've
> encountered a new issue though that appears like a bug to me.
> 
> Either one of the file descriptors (`--vfio-intr msix`, always the one
> associated with the last queue, regardless of the initialization
> order) or all of them (`--vfio-intr msi`) are available for reading
> just once per application run. I cannot get any followup interrupts
> and I can confirm by polling that there are new packets that have
> arrived.
> 
> With `--vfio-intr legacy` I get a same file descriptor for all my
> workers but it is also only triggered once.
> 
> As far as I understand there is no clear flag for the MSI(-X)
> interrupts and so I'm not sure what else to try. There is nothing of
> interest in the application output (not even with `--log-level
> lib.eal:debug`).
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jakub Budisky

Hi,

Just letting you know that I've resolved the aforementioned issues and 
it seems to be working with the Intel NIC. In the debugging process I've 
also tried a 100 Gb NIC from Mellanox with no luck so far (I can't get 
an epoll event from their "infinibandevent" (?) file descriptor, but I 
didn't invest too much time into investigating it further). On the 
bright side, trying a different NIC pointed me towards some of the 
issues so I'm glad for that.

For the record, here are the resolutions (it may help somebody in the 
future):
– Only the last queue was interrupted because my Flow Director setup was 
flawed and didn't match the incoming packets properly. So that one was 
unrelated. Needless to say that the (un)reported errors from the 
`rte_flow` API were not too helpful.
– The MSI interrupts cannot distinguish between queues, similarly to the 
legacy interrupt mechanism. Confirmed this in the DPDK source code. That 
explains the difference in behaviour. So if you want per-queue 
interrupts you are pretty much stuck with the `vfio` + MSI-X.
– And most importantly; apparently the DPDK RX interrupts were designed 
in a way that an "explicit switch back to the polling mode" is necessary 
(at least this seems to be the case for the Intel NIC / ixgbe PMD I'm 
using). You won't get another interrupt unless you re-enable them. More 
specifically, in my current code I now call 
`rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_disable` immediately after receiving the event from 
`epoll` followed by a read from the file descriptor, and 
`rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_enable` after I'm done with the packet bursts 
retrieval. I hope I won't miss an interrupt doing it this way due to a 
race condition (incoming packet in-between the processing and enabling 
the interrupt).

Thanks again for the help I've got.

Best regards,
Jakub Budisky


More information about the users mailing list