[dpdk-users] rte_mempool_get returning null

Filip Janiszewski contact at filipjaniszewski.com
Wed Jun 30 19:04:47 CEST 2021


Alright, I found the issue, was a bug introduced while moving to 21.02
(pushing a null pointer to the pool), sorry for wasting your time.

Thanks

Il 6/30/21 4:48 PM, Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen ha scritto:
> I am thinking you are also freeing the objects allocated after their use?
> 
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 6:51 PM Filip Janiszewski
> <contact at filipjaniszewski.com <mailto:contact at filipjaniszewski.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     What would be the reason for rte_mempool_get returning null even if
>     rte_mempool_avail_count returns a big positive number? I know is
>     positive since I've added a print in my code to test that..
> 
>     I've a strange issue where once I extract N items from the pool (where N
>     is the exact size of the pool) then the rte_mempool_get fails even if in
>     between the N extraction I've replenished the pool with rte_mempool_put
>     so that rte_mempool_avail_count is always positive.
> 
>     The pool is created like this:
> 
>         data_pool_ = rte_mempool_create(
>                          fdo_str_name,
>                          config_->chunk_count,
>                          chunk_size,
>                          0, // cache_size
>                          0, // private_data_size
>                          nullptr, // mp_init
>                          nullptr, // mp_init_arg
>                          nullptr, // obj_init
>                          nullptr, // obj_init_arg
>                          config_->host_socket_id,
>                          0 );
> 
>     Producer and consumer are running on separate threads, but that should
>     not be the issue since the creation flag is 0 (Multi producer/Multi
>     consumer). So in my scenario is chunk_count is say 128, then after 128
>     GET operations I get null even if I PUT back 128 items before this last
>     GET (and again, rte_mempool_avail_count is 128...)
> 
>     Is weird, since this is happening since I've upgraded to 21.02 from
>     20.02.1, may I have messed up the compilation of the new DPDK? How can I
>     investigate this issue?
> 
>     Thanks
> 
>     -- 
>     BR, Filip
>     +48 666 369 823
> 

-- 
BR, Filip
+48 666 369 823


More information about the users mailing list