mlx5: imissed / out_of_buffer counter always 0

[Slava Ovsiienko]

Hi, Daniel

I would recommend to take the following action:

- update the firmware, 16.33.xxxx looks to be outdated a little bit. Please, try 16.35.1012 or later.
  mlx5_glue->devx_obj_create might succeed with the newer FW.
- try to specify dv_flow_en=0 devarg, it forces mlx5 PMD to use rdma_core library for queue management
 and kernel driver will  be aware about Rx queues being created and attach them to the kernel counter set

With best regards,
Slava

From: Daniel Östman <daniel.ostman at ericsson.com>
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 3:59 PM
To: users at dpdk.org
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; maxime.coquelin at redhat.com; david.marchand at redhat.com
Subject: mlx5: imissed / out_of_buffer counter always 0

Hi,

I’m deploying a containerized DPDK application in an OpenShift Kubernetes environment using DPDK 21.11.3.
The application uses a Mellanox ConnectX-5 100G NIC through VFs.

The problem I have is that the ETH stats counter imissed (which seems to be mapped to “out_of_buffer” internally in mlx5 PMD driver) is 0 when I don’t expect it to be, i.e. when the application doesn’t read the packets fast enough.

Using GDB I can see that it tries to access the counter through /sys/class/infiniband/mlx5_99/ports/1/hw_counters/out_of_buffer but the hw_counters directory is missing so it will just return a zero value. I don’t know why it is missing.
When looking at mlx5_os_read_dev_stat() I can see that there is an alternative way of reading the counter, through mlx5_devx_cmd_queue_counter_query() but under the condition that priv->q_counters are set.
It doesn’t get set in my case because mlx5_glue->devx_obj_create() fails (errno 22) in mlx5_devx_cmd_queue_counter_alloc().

Have I missed something?

NIC info:
Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5] - 100Gb 2-port QSFP28 MCX516A-CCHT
driver: mlx5_core
version: 5.0-0
firmware-version: 16.33.1048 (MT_0000000417)

Please let me know if I need to provide more information.

Best regards,
Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/attachments/20230602/7f08a557/attachment-0001.htm>