Query regarding netvsc PMD : VF removal
Nandini Rangaswamy
nandini.rangaswamy at broadcom.com
Thu Jul 25 19:52:18 CEST 2024
Hi,
I am integrating my DPDK app (using DPDK version 22.11) with Netvsc PMD. I
was testing the use case of VF removal with the DPDK app.
I registered for hotplug notification in the DPDK app and enabled DPDK
logs. I see the APIs being invoked for VF removal from the logs below:
2024-07-25T17:28:13.317 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
hn_eth_rmv_event_callback(): Removing VF portid 0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.318 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
Ignoring uevent 'remove@
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A03:00/device:07/VMBUS:01/80033a99-bc5e-43c7-aeea-e5773d4414d2/pcibc5e:00/bc5e:00:02.0/infiniband/mlx5_0'
2024-07-25T17:28:13.318 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
hn_nvs_set_datapath(): set datapath Synthetic
2024-07-25T17:28:13.318 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
hn_remove_delayed(): Start to remove port 0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0 stopping device
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: mlx5 list NIC_ingress_0_0_matcher_list entry 0x10c9e6300
removed.
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: mlx5 list hrxq entry 0x10c942f00 removed.
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: mlx5 list NIC_ingress_0_0_matcher_list entry 0x10c9e6a40
removed.
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: mlx5 list mlx5_0_flow_table entry 0x17fdc9040 removed.
2024-07-25T17:28:13.319 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0: 0 flows flushed before stopping
2024-07-25T17:28:13.320 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0 Tx queue 0 freeing WRs
2024-07-25T17:28:13.321 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0 Rx queue 0 freeing 8192 WRs
2024-07-25T17:28:13.321 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0 closing device "mlx5_0"
2024-07-25T17:28:13.321 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0: 0 flows flushed before stopping
2024-07-25T17:28:13.322 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: freeing B-tree 0x10cb88134 with table 0x10cb86bc0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.324 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_net: port 0 Tx queue 0 freeing WRs
2024-07-25T17:28:13.324 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: freeing B-tree 0x10ca2dfe8 with table 0x10ca2c980
2024-07-25T17:28:13.334 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
request: eal_dev_mp_request
2024-07-25T17:28:13.334 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
PCI device bc5e:00:02.0 on NUMA socket -1
2024-07-25T17:28:13.334 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
remove driver: 15b3:1016 mlx5_pci
2024-07-25T17:28:13.336 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
mlx5_common: freeing B-tree 0x1801d9dc0 with table 0x1801d7500
2024-07-25T17:28:13.828 |13590| MSG [NET]
dpdk_dev_event_callback:295 HOTPLUG: event callback 1 device bc5e:00:02.0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.828 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
netvsc_hotadd_callback(): Device notification type=1
device_name=bc5e:00:02.0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.828 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
netvsc_hotadd_callback(): Device notification type=1
device_name=bc5e:00:02.0
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
receive uevent(name:(null), type:1, subsystem:0)
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
Ignoring uevent 'unbind@
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A03:00/device:07/VMBUS:01/80033a99-bc5e-43c7-aeea-e5773d4414d2'
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
Ignoring uevent 'remove@
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A03:00/device:07/VMBUS:01/80033a99-bc5e-43c7-aeea-e5773d4414d2'
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13590| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112 EAL:
Ignoring uevent 'remove@/channels/41'
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13597| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
hn_nvs_handle_vfassoc(): VF serial 3 remove from port 2
2024-07-25T17:28:13.829 |13597| MSG [NET] dpdk_log_write:112
hn_vf_remove(): VF path not active.
However, I see the synthetic interface not being unbound from the
uio_hv_generic driver.
Should it be done as part of hotplug notification by my DPDK app or should
DPDK code already take care of it ?
Regards,
Nandini
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and
destroy any printed copy of it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/attachments/20240725/f05c9771/attachment.htm>
More information about the users
mailing list