<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:56 PM Christian Ehrhardt <<a href="mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com">christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 5:16 PM Mcnamara, John <<a href="mailto:john.mcnamara@intel.com" target="_blank">john.mcnamara@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > From: <a href="mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com" target="_blank">christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com</a> <<a href="mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com" target="_blank">christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com</a>><br>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 10:18 AM<br>
> > Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <<a href="mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com" target="_blank">christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com</a>><br>
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Extend 19.11.x support period to 3 years<br>
> ><br>
> > From: Christian Ehrhardt <<a href="mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com" target="_blank">christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com</a>><br>
> ><br>
> > It was discussed in various places by now, along with the switch of the<br>
> > main development branch to three per year we also want to extend the<br>
> > lifetime of the LTS releases.<br>
><br>
> Hi Christian,<br>
><br>
> Zhaoyan and the Intel System Test team agree to test the additional year 3 releases.<br>
><br>
> John<br>
><br>
> Acked-by: John McNamara <<a href="mailto:john.mcnamara@intel.com" target="_blank">john.mcnamara@intel.com</a>><br>
<br>
@Mcnamara, John - Intel usually submits two test results.<br>
One like <a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-August/033130.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-August/033130.html</a><br>
And one separately for "Intel(R) Testing with Open vSwitch" like<br>
<a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-June/031702.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-June/031702.html</a><br>
Does the above commitment include both?<br>
<br>
I forgot, I also give my own ok in regard to Canonical testing of<br>
further 19.11 releases.<br>
<br>
Looking at the usual major test coverage providers we still need an answer from:<br>
- RedHat (like <a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-September/033218.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-September/033218.html</a>)<br>
  @Pei Zhang ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hello Christian,</div><div><br></div><div>Ack. We are OK to test further 19.11 releases in the next year. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Pei<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
- Nvidia (like <a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-August/033131.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-August/033131.html</a>)<br>
  @Ali Alnubani ?<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Christian Ehrhardt<br>
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server<br>
Canonical Ltd<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>