[dpdk-ci] New 100G Broadcom NIC Ubuntu

Brandon Lo blo at iol.unh.edu
Tue Aug 4 19:42:09 CEST 2020


Hi Ajit,

Yes, I believe the issue is coming from the trex/tester system with the
100G NIC.
I'm not sure what causes this issue; if I run trex using the command "cd
/opt/v2.82;./t-rex-64 -i --cfg /etc/trex_cfg_100g.yaml -c 7", which is the
same command used in DTS, it seems to launch without failing.

If you want to replicate it, here are the steps that I ran:

   1. (on io) cd /opt/dts
   2. export DTS_CFG_FOLDER='conf_100g'
      - conf_100g has the new configuration files to use the new PCI id and
      pktgen config file
   3. ./dts -s


Thanks for your help,
Brandon

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:38 PM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
wrote:

> Hi Brandon,
> No, I haven't seen or heard this before.
> But I will try to have someone run it again.
>
> Just to make sure -
> You are running trex on the 100G NIC and the problem is encountered on
> that setup?
> Or is it the system that is running testpmd where you are running into the
> issue?
>
> Thanks
> Ajit
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:16 AM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ajit,
>>
>> I'm running into a problem with trying to run nic_single_core_perf on the
>> new NIC.
>> The current configuration uses trex version v2.82.
>> However, I'm running into an error when it tries to actually do a test
>> case in the nic_single_core_perf.
>>
>> The output looks like this when it reaches a test case:
>>
>> TestNicSingleCorePerf: Test running at parameters: framesize: 64,
>>> rxd/txd: 512
>>>                       dut.rhea: ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd
>>> -l 16,17 -n 4 -w 0000:81:00.0 -w 0000:81:00.1
>>>  --file-prefix=dpdk_11307_20200804160513    -- -i  --portmask=0x3 --txd=512
>>> --rxd=512
>>>                       dut.rhea: start
>>>          TestNicSingleCorePerf: Test Case test_perf_nic_single_core
>>> Result ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "/opt/dts/framework/test_case.py", line 316, in _execute_test_case
>>>     case_obj()
>>>   File "tests/TestSuite_nic_single_core_perf.py", line 198, in
>>> test_perf_nic_single_core
>>>     self.perf_test(self.nb_ports)
>>>   File "tests/TestSuite_nic_single_core_perf.py", line 259, in perf_test
>>>     _, packets_received =
>>> self.tester.pktgen.measure_throughput(stream_ids=streams,
>>> options=traffic_opt)
>>>   File "/opt/dts/framework/pktgen_base.py", line 245, in
>>> measure_throughput
>>>     self._prepare_transmission(stream_ids=stream_ids)
>>>   File "/opt/dts/framework/pktgen_trex.py", line 779, in
>>> _prepare_transmission
>>>     self._conn.reset(ports=self._ports)
>>>   File
>>> "/opt/v2.82/automation/trex_control_plane/interactive/trex/common/trex_api_annotators.py",
>>> line 51, in wrap2
>>>     ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
>>>   File
>>> "/opt/v2.82/automation/trex_control_plane/interactive/trex/stl/trex_stl_client.py",
>>> line 339, in reset
>>>     self.clear_stats(ports)
>>>   File
>>> "/opt/v2.82/automation/trex_control_plane/interactive/trex/common/trex_api_annotators.py",
>>> line 51, in wrap2
>>>     ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
>>>   File
>>> "/opt/v2.82/automation/trex_control_plane/interactive/trex/stl/trex_stl_client.py",
>>> line 1467, in clear_stats
>>>     self._clear_stats_common(ports, clear_global, clear_xstats)
>>>   File
>>> "/opt/v2.82/automation/trex_control_plane/interactive/trex/common/trex_client.py",
>>> line 2840, in _clear_stats_common
>>>     raise TRexError(rc)
>>> trex.common.trex_exceptions.TRexError: *** [RPC] - Failed to get server
>>> response from tcp://127.0.0.1:4501
>>
>>
>> I have found one similar case on the github repository for trex, but the
>> solution was vendor-specific:
>> https://github.com/cisco-system-traffic-generator/trex-core/issues/147.
>> Have you ran into this issue before?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon
>>
>

-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20200804/4504cf43/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ci mailing list