[dpdk-ci] Master compilation failures in Intel CI

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Tue Jan 14 11:37:11 CET 2020


On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:33 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 14/01/2020 10:51, David Marchand:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:04 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > 14/01/2020 08:18, Chen, Zhaoyan:
> > > > - one patchset includes document change and other specific PMD driver change.
> > > >   This kind of patchset will be pointed to dpdk master
> > >
> > > For doc/, we must make sure each part of the doc is well sorted
> > > in MAINTAINERS so we can distinguish crypto and ethdev docs for instance.
> >
> > The doc/ pattern is currently filtered out, if this is what you are
> > referring to.
>
> I think the doc/ directory should be not filtered out,
> because patches which are updating only the doc of a driver or a tool
> need to be directed to the right tree/maintainer.

I mean the doc/ (hungry) pattern, not the directory, is filtered out:
https://git.dpdk.org/tools/dpdk-ci/tree/tools/guess_git_tree.py#n173


>
> However some basic doc files may need to be filtered out.
> Examples:
>         doc/api/
>         doc/guides/conf.py

For documentation, there seems to be a lot of special cases.
Not clear to me, if you want to do it, go ahead.


> We should also filter out .gitignore

Ok, I can add it to my patch.


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the ci mailing list