[dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Fri Jun 26 09:43:48 CEST 2020

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:03 AM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, David,
> For your question, "Is it normal to see all patches with the exact same test report?"
> Yes, we always test a series, rather than a single patch. You can see the exact same report
> on any patch in a series. (it's convenient, you don't need backward to search
> the header of the series, then check result)

Convenience is subject to interpretation :-).
Other CI systems send a single report which is more sane for me.

> " One thing that comes to mind, do we have dpdk headers installed system-
> > wide on the Intel CI server(s)?"
> Sure, we do. We don't see any problem on other patch compilation, so far. but it's strange
> that your V2 and V3 is same, but v3 test is failed. (code base is same). So I will try to re-run
> your series(v3), and check what's changed on CI system between the 2 days. Is that helpful?

Just to be sure.
By this, you mean that you have some dpdk headers installed on the CI
system in /usr?

Having those headers most likely exacerbates races with dpdk headers
copy in the building directory.
This could be where my series failed.

David Marchand

More information about the ci mailing list