[dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing

[Brandon Lo]

Hi David and Zhaoyan,

>
Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled
testing for the Intel testbed.

The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.

Thanks







On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:22 AM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:58 AM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jeremy.
>>
>>
>>
>> I quickly checked per-patches results and logs for the failures. That
>> seems not always failed case.. like fluctuation.
>>
>>
>>
>> For this case, could you help to check
>>
>> - if BIOS’s turbo boost is off, C0/C1 is off, C6 is off
>>
>> - if cores’ are isolated in kernel’s parameter
>>
>> - if other tasks are scheduled on the testbed when running performance
>> test
>>
>>
>>
>> If all settings are good, we may consider it’s a regression or unstable
>> performance issue. We will double check the performance by IXIA with latest
>> DPDK master when we back to office (1 week later).
>>
>
> (replaced jeremy @mail with the dpdklab alias).
>
> Is this issue linked to the failures I see?
>
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9799/
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9800/
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9804/
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9809/
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9814/
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9820/
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> David Marchand
>


-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20200303/d1582ba9/attachment.html>