[dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing

Brandon Lo blo at iol.unh.edu
Tue Mar 10 15:46:13 CET 2020


Hi Zhaoyan,

How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES?
Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself
> after a test fast enough before another test.
> I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's
> stable enough to be put back online.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled
>> testing for the Intel testbed.
>> >
>> > The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.
>>
>> Any news about this?
>>
>> I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).
>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/
>>
>> But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.
>>
>> --
>> David Marchand
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Brandon Lo
>
> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>
> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>
> blo at iol.unh.edu
>
> www.iol.unh.edu
>


-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20200310/cbb68e46/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ci mailing list